Estimating internal transmitter and external tag retention by Walleye in the Laurentian Great Lakes over multiple years

Author:

Colborne S. F.1ORCID,Faust M. D.2,Brenden T. O.1,Hayden T. A.3,Robinson J. M.4,MacDougall T. M.5,Cook H. A.6,Isermann D. A.7ORCID,Dembkowski D. J.8,Haffley M.9,Vandergoot C. S.1

Affiliation:

1. Quantitative Fisheries Center, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

2. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Sandusky Fisheries Research Station Sandusky Ohio USA

3. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Hammond Bay Biological Station Millersburg Michigan USA

4. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Lake Erie Research Unit Dunkirk New York USA

5. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Lake Erie Management Unit Port Dover Ontario Canada

6. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Lake Erie Management Unit Wheatley Ontario Canada

7. U.S. Geological Survey, Wisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point Stevens Point Wisconsin USA

8. Wisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point Stevens Point Wisconsin USA

9. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Lake Erie Research Unit Fairview Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveBoth electronic tags (e.g., acoustic and radio transmitters) and conventional external tags are used to evaluate movement and population dynamics of fish. External tags are also sometimes used to facilitate the recovery of internal electronic tags or other instrumentation because healing can make it difficult to identify fish with internal tags based on appearance alone. With both tag types, tag shedding and failure of electronic tags can affect accuracy and precision of study results.MethodsWe used a decade (2011–2021) of recapture data for Walleye Sander vitreus tagged in the Laurentian Great Lakes, where fish were double‐ or triple‐tagged with external tags (T‐bar, loop, or internal anchor tags) and internal acoustic transmitters, to quantify external tag and internal transmitter shedding and transmitter failure rates.ResultIn total, 1125 (33%) Walleye were recovered that had retained at least one external tag or internal transmitter. No confirmed cases of transmitter shedding were observed; 15 of 899 transmitters (2%) that were checked for functionality failed prior to the expected battery expiration. The retention of external T‐bar tags 1 year after release differed depending on whether the tag was placed anterior or posterior to the secondary dorsal fin (anterior, fish length = 420 mm: 73% retention; anterior, fish length = 700 mm: 73%, posterior: 63%) but was <26% after 4 years for both tag positions and fish sizes. Internal anchor tags had an 88% 1‐year retention probability and 81% 4‐year retention probability. Loop tags had the highest 1‐year retention (89%) but after 4 years retention (28–34% depending on agency) was comparable to that of T‐bar tags.ConclusionBetter understanding of tag retention characteristics through long‐term tagging studies such as this can inform study design, be considered in model design, and ultimately improve inferences from mark–recapture studies.

Funder

Great Lakes Fishery Commission

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3