Tagger effects in aquatic telemetry: short‐term and delayed impacts of surgery in Atlantic salmon smolts

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveAn assumption of biotelemetry is that animal performance is unaffected by the tagging process and tag burden, yet this assumption is often untested or not thoroughly explored. Our objective was to explore how transmitter implantation procedures influenced Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar smolt survival and migratory performance.MethodsWe monitored radio‐tagged smolts, first in the hatchery and then in a river with a receiver array. We assessed survival and in‐river performance in relation to surgeon, surgery duration, processing order, and fish size.ResultsMortality was 13.3% during an 8‐day hatchery‐observation but was higher for fish processed by one of two experienced surgeons (25% vs. 2%). Mortality peaked three days post‐surgery and was higher for smaller fish and fish tagged during morning tagging sessions (compared to afternoons). The size effect changed over time, being greatest during the first two days post‐surgery, and continuing thereafter at a diminished level. Fish performance once released into a river also differed between surgeons (migration initiation 66% vs. 82%; and to‐lake migration success 22% vs 43%), and consistent with hatchery observations, fish tagged in the morning by one surgeon performed poorly once released.ConclusionWe highlight immediate and lingering effects of surgical procedures on smolt survival that, if not accounted for, could bias inferences about the study population. Researchers should anticipate tagger effects during study design to ensure potential tagger effects (i.e., surgeon, order tagged, conditions during tagging) are balanced across study groups of interest. Testing for a fixed tagger effect in analyses may not always be adequate because a tagger effect may covary with processing order and fish size and may change over time.