Fasciocutaneous and jejunal free flaps for circumferential hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction: A 22‐year multicenter cohort study

Author:

Tonsbeek Anthony M.1ORCID,Hundepool Caroline A.1,Smit Merel M.2,Verduijn Pieter S.2,Duraku Liron S.3,Sewnaik Aniel4,Wijnhoven Bas P. L.5,Mureau Marc A. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

2. Department of Plastic Surgery Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

3. Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

5. Department of Oncological and Gastro‐Intestinal Surgery Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIt remains unclear whether a tubed fasciocutaneous or jejunal free flap (FCFF and JFF) is preferable for reconstruction of circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects.MethodsAll consecutive patients with circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects reconstructed with an FCFF or JFF between 2000 and 2022 were included. Outcomes of interest were rates of fistulas, strictures, and donor‐site complications.ResultsIn total, 112 patients were included (35 FCFFs and 77 JFFs). Fistula and stricture rates were significantly lower following JFF compared to FCFF reconstructions, with 12% versus 34% (p = 0.008) and 29% versus 49% (p = 0.04), respectively. Severe donor‐site complications leading to surgical intervention or ICU admittance only occurred after JFF reconstructions (18%, p = 0.007).ConclusionsThe high fistula and stricture rates in FCFF reconstructions and the rate of severe abdominal complications in JFF reconstructions illustrate inherent procedure‐specific advantages and disadvantages. Relative pros and cons should be carefully weighed when tailoring treatments to the individual needs of patients.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3