Sequence comparison of spoiled gradient echo and balanced steady‐state free precession for pulmonary free‐breathing proton MRI in patients and healthy volunteers: Correspondence, repeatability, and validation with dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI

Abstract

AbstractPhase‐resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI is a proton‐based, contrast agent‐free technique derived from the Fourier decomposition approach to measure regional ventilation and perfusion dynamics during free‐breathing. Besides the necessity of extensive PREFUL postprocessing, the utilized MRI sequence must fulfill specific requirements. This study investigates the impact of sequence selection on PREFUL‐MRI–derived functional parameters by comparing the standard spoiled gradient echo (SPGRE) sequence with a lung‐optimized balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) sequence, thereby facilitating PREFULs clinical application in pulmonary disease assessment. This study comprised a prospective dataset of healthy volunteers and a retrospective dataset of patients with suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Both cohorts underwent PREFUL‐MRI with both sequences to assess the correspondence of PREFUL ventilation and perfusion parameters (A). Additionally, healthy subjects were scanned a second time to evaluate repeatability (B), whereas patients received dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI, considered the perfusion gold standard for comparison with PREFUL‐MRI (C). Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), calculated from the unprocessed images, was compared alongside median differences of PREFUL‐MRI–derived parameters using a paired Wilcoxon signed rank test. Further evaluations included calculation of the Pearson correlation, intraclass‐correlation coefficient for repeatability assessment, and spatial overlap (SO) for regional comparison of PREFUL‐MRI and DCE‐MRI. bSSFP showed a clear SNR advantage over SPGRE (median: 23 vs. 9, p < 0.001). (A) Despite significant differences, parameter values were strongly correlated (r ≥ 0.75). After thresholding, binary maps showed high healthy overlap across both cohorts (SOHealthy > 86%) and high defect overlap in the patient cohort (SODefect ≥ 48%). (B) bSSFP demonstrated slightly higher repeatability across most parameters. (C) Both sequences demonstrated comparable correspondence to DCE‐MRI, with SPGRE excelling in absolute quantification and bSSFP in spatial agreement. Although bSSFP showed superior SNR results, both sequences displayed spatial defect concordance and highly correlated PREFUL parameters with deviations regarding repeatability and alignment with DCE‐MRI.