Accuracy of Financial Disclosures in US‐Based Rheumatology Journals

Abstract

ObjectiveTransparency of disclosure in publication is necessary for readers to be aware of any potential conflicts of interest (PCOIs). Past studies of accuracy of disclosure in rheumatology journals have focused exclusively on clinical practice guidelines and not research works. We assessed discrepancy in reporting PCOIs in clinically oriented manuscripts published in the three top‐ranked (by impact factor) US‐based general rheumatology journals.MethodsWe reviewed disclosures provided by first, second, and last authors of 50 published clinically oriented articles in each of the three top‐ranked general US rheumatology journals. For each author, we extracted payment reports from the Open Payments Database (OPD) related to consulting fees, honoraria, and speaker or faculty compensation. We defined a PCOI as a payment received from a company with an ongoing clinical trial or a medication on the market related to the manuscript's subject matter within the 36 months before the online publication date. We additionally analyzed each author individually to determine whether their reported disclosures matched PCOIs from the OPD.ResultsOf 150 articles analyzed, 101 included authors with PCOIs. Ninety‐two of these 101 publications (92%) contained inaccurate (non‐ or under‐) disclosures. Among 135 authors with PCOIs, 118 reported inaccurately (87%). All 14 articles that published clinical trial results (and all 23 of their qualifying authors) had disclosure inaccuracies.ConclusionInaccurate financial disclosure by authors remains an issue in clinically oriented research studies reported in top rheumatology journals. Improved community education and firmer expectations would permit readers to better assess any possible impact of PCOIs on publications.