Ophthalmic artery Doppler at 36 weeks' gestation in prediction of pre‐eclampsia: validation and update of previous model

Author:

Mansukhani T.1,Wright A.2,Arechvo A.1ORCID,Laich A.1,Iglesias M.1,Charakida M.13,Nicolaides K. H.1

Affiliation:

1. Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital London UK

2. Institute of Health Research University of Exeter Exeter UK

3. School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London London UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo validate and extend a model incorporating maternal ophthalmic artery Doppler at 35–37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of subsequent development of pre‐eclampsia (PE).MethodsThis was a prospective validation study of screening for PE (defined according to the 2019 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria) by maternal ophthalmic artery peak systolic velocity (PSV) ratio in 6746 singleton pregnancies undergoing routine care at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation (validation dataset). Additionally, the data from the validation dataset were combined with those of 2287 pregnancies that were previously used for development of the model (training dataset), and the combined data were used to update the original model parameters. The competing‐risks model was used to estimate the individual patient‐specific risk of delivery with PE at any time and within 3 weeks from assessment by a combination of maternal demographic characteristics and medical history with PSV ratio alone and in combination with the established PE biomarkers of mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI), serum placental growth factor (PlGF) and serum soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1). We evaluated the predictive performance of the model by examining, first, the ability to discriminate between the PE and non‐PE groups using the area under the receiver‐operating‐characteristics curve and the detection rate (DR) at fixed screen‐positive (SPR) and false‐positive rates of 10% and, second, calibration by measuring the calibration slope and calibration‐in‐the‐large. McNemar's test was used to compare the performance of screening by a biophysical test (maternal factors, MAP, UtA‐PI and PSV ratio) vs a biochemical test (maternal factors, PlGF and sFlt‐1), low PlGF concentration (< 10th percentile) or high sFlt‐1/PlGF concentration ratio (> 90th percentile).ResultsIn the validation dataset, the performance of screening by maternal factors and PSV ratio for delivery with PE within 3 weeks and at any time after assessment was consistent with that in the training dataset, and there was good agreement between the predicted and observed incidence of PE. In the combined data from the training and validation datasets, good prediction for PE was achieved in screening by a combination of maternal factors, MAP, UtA‐PI, PlGF, sFlt‐1 and PSV ratio, with a DR, at a 10% SPR, of 85.0% (95% CI, 76.5–91.4%) for delivery with PE within 3 weeks and 65.7% (95% CI, 59.2–71.7%) for delivery with PE at any time after assessment. The performance of a biophysical test was superior to that of screening by low PlGF concentration or high sFlt‐1/PlGF concentration ratio but not significantly different from the performance of a biochemical test combining maternal factors with PlGF and sFlt‐1 for both PE within 3 weeks and PE at any time after assessment.ConclusionMaternal ophthalmic artery PSV ratio at 35–37 weeks' gestation in combination with other biomarkers provides effective prediction of subsequent development of PE. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Funder

Fetal Medicine Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3