A real‐time hybrid simulation framework for reliability‐based design optimization of structures subjected to pulse‐like ground motions

Abstract

AbstractReliability‐based design optimization (RBDO) traditionally relies primarily on high‐fidelity and computationally expensive simulations to search for and evaluate design solutions. However, significant disparities could emerge for complex nonlinear behavior that are challenging for numerical modeling. In contrast to mitigating the impact of inaccurate numerical modeling through optimization algorithms, laboratory experiments realistically capture the complex nonlinear behavior of structures or their components. Real‐time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is widely considered as an efficient and cost‐effective technique for integrating numerical modeling with experimental testing for structural response evaluation. This study proposes an innovative framework that utilizes RTHS for the performance assessment of candidate designs to enable RBDO of structures subjected to pulse‐like ground motions. RTHS tests are conducted to physically evaluate structural responses through realistically replicating complex nonlinear behavior of experimental substructures. This study introduces a novel penalty function‐based efficient global optimization (P‐EGO) method to minimize the required number of laboratory tests through surrogating the response quantities of interest derived from RTHS. The proposed framework is experimentally evaluated for design optimization of a two‐story four‐bay steel moment‐resisting frame with self‐centering viscous dampers subjected to pulse‐like ground motions. The results demonstrate innovative application of RTHS in dynamic optimal design to account for uncertainties. It offers an effective and efficient alternative for traditional RBDO through pure computational simulation, particularly when structural components pose challenges for numerical modeling.