Catheter‐based therapy for intermediate or high‐risk pulmonary embolism is associated with lower in‐hospital mortality in patients with cancer: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample

Author:

Leiva Orly1ORCID,Yuriditsky Eugene1,Postelnicu Radu2,Yang Eric H.3ORCID,Mukherjee Vikramjit2,Greco Allison2,Horowitz James1,Alviar Carlos1,Bangalore Sripal1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

2. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

3. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, UCLA Cardio‐Oncology Program University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) is a common complication among patients with cancer and is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. Catheter‐based therapies (CBT), including catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy, have been developed and are used in patients with intermediate or high‐risk PE. However, there is a paucity of data on outcomes in patients with cancer as most clinical studies exclude this group of patients.AimsTo characterize outcomes of patients with cancer admitted with intermediate or high‐risk PE treated with CBT compared with no CBT.MethodsPatients with an admission diagnosis of intermediate or high‐risk PE and a history of cancer from October 2015 to December 2018 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Outcomes of interest were in‐hospital death or cardiac arrest (CA) and major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without CBT. Variables that remained unbalanced after IPTW were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsA total of 2084 unweighted admissions (10,420 weighted) for intermediate or high‐risk PE and cancer were included, of which 136 (6.5%) were treated with CBT. After IPTW, CBT was associated with lower death or CA (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46–0.64) but higher major bleeding (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21–1.65). After stratifying by PE risk type, patients treated with CBT had lower risk of death or CA in both intermediate (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.75) and high‐risk PE (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33–0.53). However, patients with CBT were associated with increased risk of major bleeding in intermediate‐risk PE (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.67–2.69) but not in those with high‐risk PE (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66–1.07).ConclusionsAmong patients with cancer hospitalized with intermediate or high‐risk PE, treatment with CBT was associated with lower risk of in‐hospital death or CA but higher risk of bleeding. Prospective studies and inclusion of patients with cancer in randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3