Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
2. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
3. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, UCLA Cardio‐Oncology Program University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) is a common complication among patients with cancer and is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. Catheter‐based therapies (CBT), including catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy, have been developed and are used in patients with intermediate or high‐risk PE. However, there is a paucity of data on outcomes in patients with cancer as most clinical studies exclude this group of patients.AimsTo characterize outcomes of patients with cancer admitted with intermediate or high‐risk PE treated with CBT compared with no CBT.MethodsPatients with an admission diagnosis of intermediate or high‐risk PE and a history of cancer from October 2015 to December 2018 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Outcomes of interest were in‐hospital death or cardiac arrest (CA) and major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without CBT. Variables that remained unbalanced after IPTW were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsA total of 2084 unweighted admissions (10,420 weighted) for intermediate or high‐risk PE and cancer were included, of which 136 (6.5%) were treated with CBT. After IPTW, CBT was associated with lower death or CA (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46–0.64) but higher major bleeding (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21–1.65). After stratifying by PE risk type, patients treated with CBT had lower risk of death or CA in both intermediate (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.75) and high‐risk PE (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33–0.53). However, patients with CBT were associated with increased risk of major bleeding in intermediate‐risk PE (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.67–2.69) but not in those with high‐risk PE (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66–1.07).ConclusionsAmong patients with cancer hospitalized with intermediate or high‐risk PE, treatment with CBT was associated with lower risk of in‐hospital death or CA but higher risk of bleeding. Prospective studies and inclusion of patients with cancer in randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献