W/holistic participatory democracy: An ideal societal governance design

Author:

Dostal Elisabeth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. BiomatrixWeb Cape Town South Africa

Abstract

AbstractCurrent societal systems (including societal governance) are legacy systems of the industrial age. They are derived from reductionist thinking, the worldview of the industrial age. With the advancing information age, they become increasingly problem riddled and need to be transformed, based on a new worldview (i.e., w/holistic or systems thinking). The aim of this paper is to create an ideal w/holistic democracy design that dissolves current problems, serves citizens, and allows their direct participation in governance. The research method is a theory‐based design, whereby generic organizing principles of Biomatrix Systems Theory are applied to create the design. The theory distinguishes between organismic and functional systems, whereby an organism (e.g., nation) emerges from the interaction of its functions (e.g., political, economic, cultural, and ecological) organized by an ethos, as well as from the interaction with other organisms (i.e., citizens, organizations, and other nations). Those distinctions give rise to a five‐faceted governance design (i.e., concerned with the conceptual and physical reality of the nation, single and multifunctional development, and relations with other systems), which is executed by different governance structures (i.e., a Citizens Forum, National Development Forum, and Function Forums), with the dual participation of citizens as equal members of the nation (using a general vote) and as expert citizens associated with a specific societal function (using a functional vote). Because the theory describes generic w/holistic organizing principles, it can be concluded that the implementation of the design (called W/Holistic Participatory Democracy) will dissolve problems derived from the current reductionist representative democracy model.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference9 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Foundational perspectives on systems practice for professions;Systems Research and Behavioral Science;2024-08-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3