Stratification of surgical margin distances by the millimeter on local recurrence in oral cavity cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractThere are limited data supporting the commonly suggested 5 mm margin cutoff as the optimum value in defining clear margins in oral cancer. A database search of Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost was performed from inception to June 2022. A random‐effects model was chosen for this meta‐analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed throughout this study. Seven studies met study criteria (2215 patients). The risk ratio was significantly higher for margins <5 mm when compared to those ≥5 mm (2.09 (95%CI: 1.53–2.86, I2 = 0.47)). Subgroup analysis (I2 = 0.15) of margin distances of 0.0–0.9, 1.0–1.9, 2.0–2.9, 3.0–3.9, and 4.0–4.9 mm calculated risk ratios for local recurrence of 2.96, 2.01, 2.17, 1.8, and 0.98, respectively. Margins between 4.0 and 4.9 mm had similar risk ratios for local recurrence compared to ≥5 mm, while margins <4.0 were significantly higher.