Affiliation:
1. University of South Africa Pretoria South Africa
2. Adelaide University Adelaide Australia
3. Universitas Padjadjaran Sumedang Indonesia
4. Mupo Foundation Johannesburg South Africa
5. Dzomo la Mupo Vuwani South Africa
6. Wild Law Institute Cape Town South Africa
7. Center for Decentralization and Participatory Development Research, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran Sumedang Indonesia
Abstract
AbstractThe paper reflects on the lessons from two case studies in order to discuss (1) how they address Ostrom's eight principles and (2) implications for social, economic and environmental challenges. The two case studies are of forest communities in Venda in South Africa and Ciptagelar, West Java, discussed in terms of their social, environmental and economic approaches. In both cases, the communities see themselves as related to nature; in the case of Venda, they express this as a totemic relationship and have been inspired to apply an ecological calendar that was taught to them during the time Mphatheleni Makaulule spent learning from Amazonian leaders. In the case of Ciptagelar, the nomadic way of life is based on a sense of being stewards who do not commodify rice, a sacred source of life, which is in turn dependent upon all the co‐existent creatures and ultimately the forest, which is their home. In both communities, the environment and people are priorities managed by observing the natural cycle. In both communities, an ecological calendar guides the planning and harvesting of crops. In Tshidzivhe Venda, a rigorous approach to crops, harvesting from the forest and re‐planting the forest, is observed, and the entire community act as caretakers and are required to ask permission before harvesting from the forest. In Ciptagelar, West Java, the chief reads the signs when it is time to move to another area and follows a careful approach to biodiversity ensuring that paddy is grown only for certain months so that other creatures can thrive in other months. The Balancing Individualism and Collectivism Special Integration Group has focused on learning by doing using an applied mixed methods approach. It is based on a community of practice spanning NGOs, community projects and university departments. It is supported by a small NRF fund, some funding from UNISA and in kind support from participants. We work together because of shared values and mutual respect.
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Strategy and Management,General Social Sciences
Reference47 articles.
1. Bateson. (2022).Plenary July 12th International Systems Sciences.https://zoom.us/rec/play/_oe07ngyK1jHXqZxIaT5nBr_c95ReZ2KWOwXCrYw7u1K6rKfJRUPtUH_urEVNtlI9m1WDZbqZFxJ8k7i.po_IqnXsYX9swRJr?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=u3XXrLmPQCaoiZM3sR9LHA.1626085969999.920d3aa8d2c700ad3a46aaaca293852c&_x_zm_rhtaid=301
2. Decolonising transdisciplinary research approaches: an African perspective for enhancing knowledge integration in sustainability science
3. Creecy B.(2022).https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-03-31-indigenous-communities-crucial-to-protecting-biodiversity-says-creecy/
4. Forsetto R.(2020).Chief Raoni Nobel Peace Prize nominee presides over historic meeting with over 600 indigenous leaders in Brazil on 5 February 2020.
5. The Tragedy of the Commons
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献