Permafrost Distribution in the Southern Carpathians, Romania, Derived From Machine Learning Modeling

Author:

Popescu Răzvan12ORCID,Filhol Simon3ORCID,Etzelmüller Bernd3ORCID,Vasile Mirela2ORCID,Pleșoianu Alin4ORCID,Vîrghileanu Marina1ORCID,Onaca Alexandru5ORCID,Șandric Ionuț1ORCID,Săvulescu Ionuț1ORCID,Cruceru Nicolae6ORCID,Vespremeanu‐Stroe Alfred12ORCID,Westermann Sebastian2ORCID,Sîrbu Flavius7ORCID,Mihai Bogdan1ORCID,Nedelea Alexandru1ORCID,Gascoin Simon8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Geography University of Bucharest Bucharest Romania

2. Division of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences University of Bucharest Research Institute Bucharest Romania

3. Department of Geosciences University of Oslo Oslo Norway

4. Professional Services Department ESRI Romania Bucharest Romania

5. Department of Geography West University of Timișoara Timișoara Romania

6. Emil Racoviță Institute of Speleology Romanian Academy Bucharest Romania

7. Institute for Advanced Environmental Research West University of Timișoara Timișoara Romania

8. Centre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère Université de Toulouse, CNRS–CNES–IRD–INRA–UPS Toulouse France

Abstract

ABSTRACTComputer modeling of sporadic and isolated patches of mountain permafrost distribution is difficult to implement without overestimating it. The main challenge is to determine the very areas where the criteria for permafrost maintenance are met. This paper aims to modeling the permafrost distribution in the Southern Carpathians (SC), a typical marginal periglacial mountain range. For this purpose, a collection of 883 bottom temperature of late winter snow cover (BTS) points was used as a proxy for permafrost presence or absence in order to train several machine learning models. The performances of each model were evaluated with AUC with varying between 0.99 for Maxent and 0.74 for K‐nearest neighbors and most models (five) exhibiting values between 0.82 and 0.86. Other tests such as confusion matrices, sensitivity analyses, data shuffling, and data size reduction tests indicated that Maxent, AdaBoost, and support vector machine offered the best results while logistic regression, neural network, and gradient boosting exhibited rather poor permafrost distributions. The final ensemble median model indicated a total permafrost area of 19.2 km2 occupying 1%–9% of the alpine area of the studied massifs. NDVI proved crucial for permafrost prediction because it allows delimiting the debris surfaces where permafrost is probable.

Funder

Norway Grants

Universitatea din București

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3