Affiliation:
1. Department of Periodontology, Eastman Institute for Oral Health University of Rochester Rochester New York USA
2. Statistical Methods and Data Analytics UCLA Office of Advanced Research Computing Los Angeles California USA
3. Section of Periodontics, Division of Regenerative and Reconstructive Sciences UCLA School of Dentistry Los Angeles California USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo assess which decontamination method(s) used for the debridement of titanium surfaces (disks and dental implants) contaminated with bacterial, most efficiently eliminate bacterial biofilms.Material and MethodsA systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases between January 1, 2010 and October 31, 2022. The search strategy followed the PICOS format and included only in vitro studies completed on either dental implant or titanium disk samples. The assessed outcome variable consisted of the most effective method(s)—chemical or mechanical— removing bacterial biofilm from titanium surfaces. A meta‐analysis was conducted, and data was summarized through single‐ and multi‐level random effects model (p < .05).ResultsThe initial search resulted in 5260 articles after the removal of duplicates. After assessment by title, abstract, and full‐text review, a total of 13 articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Different decontamination methods were assessed, including both mechanical and chemical, with the most common method across studies being chlorhexidine (CHX). Significant heterogeneity was noted across the included studies. The meta‐analyses only identified a significant difference in biofilm reduction when CHX treatment was compared against PBS. The remaining comparisons did not identify significant differences between the various decontamination methods.ConclusionsThe present results do not demonstrate that one method of decontamination is superior in eliminating bacterial biofilm from titanium disk and implant surfaces.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献