Therapeutic frameworks in integration sessions in substance‐assisted psychotherapy: A systematised review

Author:

Thal Sascha B.12ORCID,Baker Paris3,Marinis Jonathon4,Wieberneit Michelle5,Sharbanee Jason M.6ORCID,Bruno Raimundo3,Skeffington Petra M.2,Bright Stephen J.78

Affiliation:

1. Curtin School of Population Health Curtin University Bentley Western Australia Australia

2. School of Psychology, College of Health & Education Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia

3. School of Medicine (Psychology) University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

4. Orygen Youth Health University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia

5. Law School University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia

6. Enable Institute, Discipline of Psychology, Curtin School of Population Health Curtin University Bentley Western Australia Australia

7. School of Medical and Health Sciences Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia

8. Psychedelic Research in Science and Medicine (PRISM) Balwyn North Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractSerotonergic psychedelics and related substances have been explored as potential adjuncts in substance‐assisted psychotherapy (SAPT) for treating various disorders. SAPT can be divided into three phases: preparation, administration and integration. Integration is commonly defined as the comprehension and effective application of insights from psychedelic experiences into everyday life. However, there is limited research regarding the most appropriate therapeutic approach during SAPT. In this article, we discuss the current evidence for different therapeutic frameworks for integration sessions when serotonergic psychedelics and entactogens are used as adjuncts to psychotherapy. We conducted a systematised review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines and searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The final synthesis included 75 clinical trials, mixed‐methods investigations, treatment manuals, study protocols, quasi‐experiments, qualitative investigations, descriptive studies, opinion papers, reviews, books and book chapters, published until 11 November 2022. The effects that various therapeutic approaches for integration sessions have on therapeutic outcomes have not been investigated by means of rigorous research. Most of the available evidence we retrieved was not supported by empirical data, thus limiting any conclusive statements regarding appropriate therapeutic frameworks for integration sessions for SAPT. Current clinical studies have used a range of therapeutic frameworks with the majority drawing from the humanistic–experiential tradition. While integration is regarded as crucial for the safe application of SAPT, there is currently an insufficient evidence base to suggest that any type of therapy is effective for guiding integration sessions. A systematic investigation of different therapeutic frameworks for integration and additional therapy‐related factors is needed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3