Testing reliability and validity of practitioner‐rated parental sensitivity: A novel tool for practice

Author:

Forrer Mirte L.123ORCID,Oosterman Mirjam12,Tharner Anne12,Schuengel Carlo12

Affiliation:

1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Section of Clinical Child and Family Studies Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Jeugdbescherming Regio Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractImproving parental sensitivity is an important objective of interventions to support families. This study examined reliability and validity of parental sensitivity ratings using a novel package of an e‐learning tool and an interactive decision tree provided through a mobile application, called the OK! package. Independent raters assessed parental sensitivity using the OK! package (N = 11 raters) and the NICHD Parental Sensitivity rating scales (N = 22 raters) on the basis of videotaped mother‐child interactions at 10‐ or 12‐months‐old (N = 294) and at 24‐months‐old (N = 204) from the Dutch longitudinal cohort study Generation2. Mothers reported on children's externalizing and internalizing problems and social competence when children were 4 and 7 years old. Results showed excellent single interrater reliability for raters using the OK! package (mean ICC = .79), and strong evidence for convergent validity at 10‐ or 12‐month‐old (r = .57) and 24‐month‐old (r = .65). Prospective associations of neither parental sensitivity rated using the OK! package or the NICHD Parental Sensitivity rating scales with child developmental outcomes were statistically significant (p > .05), with overlapping 95% confidence intervals for both measures. The OK! package provides a promising direction for testing alternatives to current training and instruction modalities.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference61 articles.

1. how2stats. (n.d.). Retrieved March 31 2022 fromhttp://www.how2stats.net/2011/09/confidence‐intervals‐for‐correlations.html

2. Commissie Testaangelegenheden Nederland. (n.d.).https://www.cotandocumentatie.nl/beoordelingen/b/13412/strengths‐and‐difficulties‐questionnaire/

3. The Meta-Analysis of Clinical Judgment Project: Fifty-Six Years of Accumulated Research on Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction

4. Evaluating health visitor assessments of mother–infant interactions: A mixed methods study

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3