How Specific Is Site‐Specific? A Review and Guidance for Selecting and Evaluating Approaches for Deriving Local Water Quality Benchmarks-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How Specific Is Site‐Specific? A Review and Guidance for Selecting and Evaluating Approaches for Deriving Local Water Quality Benchmarks

Published:2019-08-28 Issue:5 Volume:15 Page:683-702
ISSN:1551-3777
Container-title:Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
language:en
Short-container-title:Integr Environ Assess Manag

Author:

van Dam Rick A¹²³,Hogan Alicia C⁴,Harford Andrew J²³,Humphrey Chris L²

Affiliation:

1. WQadvice Torrensville Australia

2. Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising ScientistAustralian Government Department of the Environment and Energy Darwin Northwest Territories Australia

3. RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Terrain Natural Resource Management Innisfail Queensland Australia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Environmental Science,General Medicine,Geography, Planning and Development

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ieam.4181

Reference102 articles.

1. [ANZG] Australian and New Zealand Governments.2018a. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Canberra (ACT): ANZG and Australian state and territory governments. [cited 2019 Apr 20].www.waterquality.gov.au/anz‐guidelines

2. [ANZG] Australian and New Zealand Governments.2018b. Deriving guideline values for water quality. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Canberra (ACT): ANZG and Australian state and territory governments. [cited 2019 Apr 20].www.waterquality.gov.au/anz‐guidelines/guideline‐values/derive

3. [ANZG] Australian and New Zealand Governments.2018c. Accounting for local conditions. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Canberra (ACT): ANZG and Australian state and territory governments. [cited 2019 Apr 20].www.waterquality.gov.au/anz‐guidelines/guideline‐values/default/water‐quality‐toxicants/local‐conditions

4. [ANZG] Australian and New Zealand Governments.2018d. Deriving guideline values using field‐effects data. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Canberra (ACT): ANZG and Australian state and territory governments. [cited 2019 Apr 20].www.waterquality.gov.au/anz‐guidelines/guideline‐values/derive/field‐effects

5. [ANZG] Australian and New Zealand Governments.2018e. Deriving guideline values using reference site data. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Canberra (ACT): ANZG and Australian state and territory governments. [cited 2019 Apr 20].www.waterquality.gov.au/anz‐guidelines/guideline‐values/derive/reference‐data

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Estimating thresholds of natural vegetation for the protection of water quality in South African catchments;Science of The Total Environment;2024-10

2. Quantifying regulatory limits for multiple stressors in an open and transparent way;Conservation Biology;2024-09-03

3. Protecting the invisible: Establishing guideline values for copper toxicity to marine microbiomes;Science of The Total Environment;2023-12

4. Linking levels of trace-metal concentrations and ambient toxicity to cladocerans to levels of effects on macroinvertebrate communities;Environmental Advances;2023-04

5. Diatom–salinity thresholds in experimental outdoor streams reinforce the need for stricter water quality guidelines in South Australia;Hydrobiologia;2023-02-14