The effect of lacosamide in peripheral neuropathic pain: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phenotype‐stratified trial

Author:

Carmland Malin Erika12ORCID,Kreutzfeldt Melissa Dall3,Holbech Jakob Vormstrup3ORCID,Brask‐Thomsen Peter Kolind1ORCID,Krøigård Thomas3ORCID,Hansen Peter Nørregaard3,Tankisi Hatice45,Jensen Troels Staehelin1ORCID,Bach Flemming Winther25ORCID,Sindrup Søren Hein3ORCID,Finnerup Nanna Brix12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus N Denmark

2. Department of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

3. Department of Neurology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNeuropathic pain is common and difficult to treat. The sodium channel blocker lacosamide is efficacious in animal models of pain, but its effect on neuropathic pain in humans is inconclusive.MethodsIn a multicentre, randomized, double‐blinded placebo‐controlled phenotype stratified trial, we examined if lacosamide produced better pain relief in patients with the irritable nociceptor phenotype compared to those without. The primary outcome was the change in daily average pain from baseline to last week of 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary and tertiary outcomes included pain relief, patient global impression of change and presence of 30% and 50% pain reduction.ResultsThe study was prematurely closed with 93 patients included and 63 randomized to lacosamide or placebo in a 2:1 ratio, of which 49 fulfilled the per protocol criteria and was used for the primary objective. We did not find a better effect of lacosamide in patients with the irritable nociceptor phenotype, the 95% CI for the primary objective was 0.41 (−1.2 to 2.0). For all patients randomized, lacosamide had no effect on the primary outcome, but significantly more patients were responders to lacosamide than during placebo, with an NNT of 4.0 (95% CI 2.3–16.1) and 5.0 (95% CI 2.8–24.5) for 30% and 50% pain reduction respectively. We did not identify any predictors for response. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated.ConclusionWe could not confirm that lacosamide was more efficacious in patients with the irritable nociceptor type, but the study was prematurely closed, so we cannot exclude a small difference.SignificanceTreatment of neuropathic pain is often a trial and error process. Little is known about which patient benefit from which kind of medication. The sodium channel blocker lacosamide shows variable effect on neuropathic pain. Pain sensory phenotype, as defined by quantitative sensory testing, did not predict response to treatment with lacosamide.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3