Pancolonic motor response to subsensory and suprasensory sacral nerve stimulation in patients with slow-transit constipation

Author:

Dinning P G12,Hunt L M2,Arkwright J W3,Patton V4,Szczesniak M M2,Wiklendt L2,Davidson J B5,Lubowski D Z4,Cook I J2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Physiology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Australia

3. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Materials Science and Engineering, Lindfield, Australia

4. Department of Anorectal Physiology, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

5. Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract Background Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is emerging as a potential treatment for patients with constipation. Although SNS can elicit an increase in colonic propagating sequences (PSs), the optimal stimulus parameters for this response remain unknown. This study evaluated the colonic motor response to subsensory and suprasensory SNS in patients with slow-transit constipation. Methods Patients with confirmed slow-transit constipation were studied. Either a water-perfused manometry catheter or a high-resolution fibre-optic manometry catheter was positioned colonoscopically to the caecum. A temporary electrode was implanted transcutaneously in the S3 sacral nerve foramen. In the fasted state, three conditions were evaluated in a double-blind randomized fashion: sham, subsensory and suprasensory stimulation. Each 2-h treatment period was preceded by a 2-h basal period. The delta (Δ) value was calculated as the frequency of the event during stimulation minus that during the basal period. Results Nine patients had readings taken with a water-perfused catheter and six with a fibre-optic catheter. Compared with sham stimulation, suprasensory stimulation caused a significant increase in the frequency of PSs (mean(s.d.) Δ value − 1·1(7·2) versus 6·1(4·0) PSs per 2 h; P = 0·004). No motor response was recorded in response to subsensory stimulation compared with sham stimulation. Compared with subsensory stimulation, stimulation at suprasensory levels caused a significant increase in the frequency of PSs (P = 0·006). Conclusion In patients with slow-transit constipation, suprasensory SNS increased the frequency of colonic PSs, whereas subsensory SNS stimulation did not. This has implications for the design of therapeutic trials and the clinical application of the device.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 73 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Efficacy of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in functional constipation;European Journal of Pediatrics;2023-01-13

2. Constipation;Pediatric Surgery;2023

3. Defecation induced by stimulation of sacral S2 spinal root in cats;American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology;2021-12-01

4. Control of colonic motility using electrical stimulation to modulate enteric neural activity;American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology;2021-04-01

5. ManoMap: an automated system for characterization of colonic propagating contractions recorded by high-resolution manometry;Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing;2021-01-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3