The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on dental school assessments – Current status and future perspectives

Author:

Parikh Neha1ORCID,Gardner Amity2,Myers Alan L.1,Halpin Richard3,Holland Julian N.3,van der Hoeven Dharini1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences School of Dentistry The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston USA

2. Department of General Practice and Dental Public Health School of Dentistry The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston USA

3. School of Dentistry The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate course directors’ feedback on the assessment methods used during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic and identify effective approaches for future assessments in dental education.MethodsCourse directors at the US dental schools were surveyed for changes in assessments implemented during the early stages of the pandemic (March–July 2020) using the Qualtrics platform. The survey questions addressed assessment methods utilized in didactic, preclinical, and clinical arenas pre‐COVID‐19 (before March 2020) and during the early phase of the pandemic (between March and July 2020) and identified any sustained changes in assessments post‐COVID‐19. Of the 295 responses for the type of courses directed, 48%, 22%, and 30% responses were for didactic, pre‐clinical, and clinical assessments, respectively. Chi‐square tests and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess quantitative differences.ResultsComputer‐based un‐proctored and remote– proctored assessments increased whereas paper‐based in‐person proctored assessments decreased during an early pandemic. For pre‐clinical and clinical courses, objective‐structured clinical exams and case‐based assessments increased whereas, for didactic courses, the number of presentations, short‐answer, and multiple‐choice questions‐based assessments increased. Specimen‐based assessments and patient‐based encounters decreased significantly in didactic and clinical courses, respectively. Manikin‐based exams increased in clinical but not in pre‐clinical courses. Survey respondents disagreed that alternative assessments helped students learn better, resulted in better course evaluations, or were an equivalent replacement for pre‐COVID‐19 assessments. Interestingly, 49% of respondents indicated a likelihood of continuing alternative assessments whereas 36% were unlikely and 15% were neutral.ConclusionsA combination of effective pre‐pandemic and innovative alternative assessments developed during the pandemic may be the new normal in the dental education curriculum.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3