Communication preferences and perceptions of cancer patient during their first medical oncology appointment

Author:

Vicente Rodrigo Santos12ORCID,Freitas Ana Rita1,Ferreira Ricardo Miguel Azevedo1,Prada Sofia Parada1,Martins Telma Sofia1,Martins Telma Caleça1,Duarte Mendes Ana1,Vitorino Marina Miguel1,Chaves Andreia Filipa13,Santos Catarina Castro4,Alpuim Costa Diogo345ORCID,Custódio Maria Paula1,Barbosa Miguel67

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Medical Oncology Amadora Portugal

2. Faculty of Medicine University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

3. CUF Oncologia Haematology and Medical Oncology Lisbon Portugal

4. Hospital de Cascais Dr. José de Almeida Medical Oncology Alcabideche Portugal

5. NOVA Medical School, NOVA University Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

6. Faculty of Psychology ULisboa CICPSI Lisbon Portugal

7. ISAMB Faculty of Medicine ISAMB Lisbon Portugal

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe first medical oncology appointment serves as a platform for patients to comprehend their diagnosis and prognostic implications of cancer. This study aimed to determine patients' communication preferences during their first medical oncology appointment and to assess the disparities between patients' preferences and perceptions.MethodsA total of 169 cancer patients participated by completing the Communication in First Medical Oncology Appointment Questionnaire (C‐FAQ), a two‐section questionnaire designed to assess patients’ preferences and perceptions regarding Content (information provided and its extent), Facilitation (timing and location of information delivery), and Support (emotional support) during their first medical oncology appointment. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the variations between preferences and perceptions.ResultsContent emerged as the most significant dimension compared to Facilitation and Support. The physician's knowledge, honesty, and ability to provide clear information were considered the most important attributes. Patients evaluated most of their preferences as “very important”. Patients’ perception of the communication dimensions present during their appointment was below preferences for 11 items, indicating significant discrepancies in clinical practice.ConclusionsPatients highly valued their preferences concerning Content, Facilitation, and Support dimensions of communication. However, patient preferences were more prominently oriented towards the Content dimension. The discrepancies between preferences and perceptions should be viewed as an opportunity for enhancing communication skills through training.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Oncology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference27 articles.

1. Doctor‐patient communication: a review;Ha JF;Ochsner J,2010

2. Lea Ann HansenP.Challenges Patients Face in Cancer Care: Implications for the Healthcare Team;2012. Published online February 9. Accessed 3 December 2022.https://www.theoncologypharmacist.com/top‐issues/issue‐archive/14797‐top‐14797

3. Breaking Bad News About Cancer: Patients’ Preferences for Communication

4. Delivering Bad News: Self-Assessment and Educational Preferences of Medical Students

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3