European randomized controlled trial evaluating differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and conventional medical management in subjects with persistent back pain ineligible for spine surgery: 24‐month results

Author:

Kallewaard Jan W.12,Billet Bart3,Van Paesschen Raf4,Smet Iris5,Mendiola Agustin6,Peña Isaac7,López Pablo8,Carceller Javier8,Tornero Carlos9,Zuidema Xander1011,Vesper Jan12,Lehmberg Jens13,Laloo Wim14,Cedeño David L.14,Vallejo Ricardo14

Affiliation:

1. Rijnstate Elst The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. AZ Delta Roeselare Belgium

4. GZA Hospitals Wilrijk Belgium

5. Vitaz St Niklaas Belgium

6. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Madrid Spain

7. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío Sevilla Spain

8. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago Santiago de Compostela Spain

9. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia Valencia Spain

10. Diakonessenhuis Zeist The Netherlands

11. Maastricht UMC+ Maastricht The Netherlands

12. Uniklinik Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

13. München Klinik Bogenhausen Bogenhausen Germany

14. SGX Medical LLC Bloomington Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDifferential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation (DTM SCS) was shown to be superior to conventional SCS for treating chronic low back pain (CLBP) in subjects with persistent spinal pain syndrome with previous spinal surgery (PSPS‐T2) or ineligible for it (PSPS‐T1). This study reports 24‐month efficacy and safety of DTM SCS vs. conventional medical management (CMM) in PSPS‐T1 subjects across four European countries.MethodsThis is a prospective, multicenter, open‐label, randomized, controlled trial with optional crossover. Subjects randomized 1:1 to DTM SCS or CMM. Primary endpoint was responder rate (% subjects reporting ≥50% CLBP relief) at 6 months. A superiority test compared responder rates between treatments. CLBP and leg pain levels, functional disability, quality of life (QoL), patient satisfaction and global impression of change were evaluated for 24 months. A Composite Responder Index (CRI) was obtained using CLBP relief, disability and QoL. Incidence of study‐related adverse events evaluated safety.ResultsA total of 55 and 57 subjects were randomized to DTM SCS and CMM respectively. DTM SCS was superior, with CLBP responder rates ≥80% and CLBP relief >5.6 cm (>70% reduction) through the 24‐month follow‐up. Improvements with DTM SCS in other outcomes were sustained. The CRI was >80% for DTM SCS through 24 months. Opioid medication intake decreased in subjects treated with DTM SCS. Most patients treated with DTM SCS felt satisfied and improved at the end of the study. Safety was congruent with other studies.ConclusionDTM SCS is efficacious and safe during 24 months for the treatment of CLBP and leg pain in PSPS‐T1 patients ineligible for spine surgery.Significance statementThis randomized controlled trial shows that Differential Target Multiplexed SCS (DTM SCS) is an effective and safe long‐term treatment for PSPS type 1 patients suffering from axial low back pain with or without leg pain and who are ineligible for spinal surgery. Currently, CMM treatments are their only option and provide limited benefits. Besides superior pain relief, DTM SCS provides significant improvements in functional disability, quality of life, high levels of satisfaction and perceived impression of change.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3