Trust in Health Care and Science: Toward Common Ground on Key Concepts
-
Published:2023-09
Issue:S2
Volume:53
Page:
-
ISSN:0093-0334
-
Container-title:Hastings Center Report
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hastings Center Report
Author:
Taylor Lauren A.,Solomon Mildred Z.,Kaebnick Gregory E.
Abstract
AbstractThis essay summarizes key insights across the essays in the Hastings Center Report's special report “Time to Rebuild: Essays on Trust in Health Care and Science.” These insights concern trust and trustworthiness as distinct concepts, competence as a necessary but not sufficient input to trust, trust as a reciprocal good, trust as an interpersonal as well as structural phenomena, the ethical impermissibility of seeking to win trust without being trustworthy, building and borrowing trust as distinct strategies, and challenges to trustworthiness posed by the contingent nature of science. Together, these insights stand to advance an area of research that we believe has been historically stymied by conceptual confusion and a long‐standing insistence on treating trust as a purely instrumental good.
Subject
Health Policy,Philosophy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science),Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering
Reference29 articles.
1. L.Read L.Korenda andH.Nelson “Rebuilding Trust in Health Care ” Deloitte Insights August 5 2021 https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/health-care/trust-in-health-care-system.html.
2. “Resources ” Coalition for Trust in Health and Science accessed August 17 2023 https://trustinhealthandscience.org/resources/.
3. Trust in Medicine, the Health System & Public Health
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献