Compositional variation in grassland plant communities

Author:

Bakker Jonathan D.1ORCID,Price Jodi N.2,Henning Jeremiah A.34ORCID,Batzer Evan E.5,Ohlert Timothy J.6ORCID,Wainwright Claire E.1ORCID,Adler Peter B.7ORCID,Alberti Juan8,Arnillas Carlos Alberto9ORCID,Biederman Lori A.10,Borer Elizabeth T.3ORCID,Brudvig Lars A.11ORCID,Buckley Yvonne M.12,Bugalho Miguel N.13,Cadotte Marc W.9ORCID,Caldeira Maria C.14,Catford Jane A.15ORCID,Chen Qingqing16ORCID,Crawley Michael J.17,Daleo Pedro8ORCID,Dickman Chris R.18ORCID,Donohue Ian12,DuPre Mary Ellyn19,Ebeling Anne20,Eisenhauer Nico2122ORCID,Fay Philip A.23ORCID,Gruner Daniel S.24ORCID,Haider Sylvia212526ORCID,Hautier Yann27ORCID,Jentsch Anke28,Kirkman Kevin29,Knops Johannes M. H.30,Lannes Lucíola S.31,MacDougall Andrew S.32,McCulley Rebecca L.33ORCID,Mitchell Rachel M.34ORCID,Moore Joslin L.353637ORCID,Morgan John W.38,Mortensen Brent39ORCID,Olde Venterink Harry40ORCID,Peri Pablo L.41,Power Sally A.42,Prober Suzanne M.43,Roscher Christiane2144ORCID,Sankaran Mahesh4546,Seabloom Eric W.3ORCID,Smith Melinda D.47,Stevens Carly48,Sullivan Lauren L.1149ORCID,Tedder Michelle29,Veen G. F. (Ciska)50ORCID,Virtanen Risto51ORCID,Wardle Glenda M.18

Affiliation:

1. School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

2. Gulbali Institute Charles Sturt University Albury New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota USA

4. Department of Biology University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USA

5. Department of Plant Sciences University of California – Davis Davis California USA

6. Department of Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA

7. Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center Utah State University Logan Utah USA

8. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC) CONICET – UNMDP Mar del Plata Argentina

9. Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences University of Toronto – Scarborough Scarborough Ontario Canada

10. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA

11. Department of Plant Biology and Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

12. Department of Zoology Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland

13. Centre for Applied Ecology “Prof. Baeta Neves” (CEABN‐InBIO), School of Agriculture University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

14. Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

15. Department of Geography King's College London London UK

16. Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Science Peking University Beijing China

17. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London Silwood Park UK

18. Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

19. MPG Ranch Missoula Montana USA

20. Institute of Ecology and Evolution Friedrich‐Schiller‐University Jena Jena Germany

21. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany

22. Institute of Biology University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany

23. USDA, Agricultural Research Service Grassland Soil and Water Research Lab Temple Texas USA

24. Department of Entomology University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA

25. Institute of Ecology, Leuphana University of Lüneburg Lüneburg Germany

26. Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle Germany

27. Ecology and Biodiversity Group, Department of Biology Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

28. Department of Disturbance Ecology, BayCEER University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany

29. Centre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu‐Natal Pietermaritzburg South Africa

30. Department Health & Environmental Sciences Xi'an Jiaotong‐Liverpool University Suzhou China

31. Department of Biology and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP) Ilha Solteira São Paulo Brazil

32. Department of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada

33. Department of Plant & Soil Sciences University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA

34. School of Natural Resources and the Environment Arizona State University Tucson Arizona USA

35. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Heidelberg Victoria Australia

36. School of Biological Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

37. School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

38. Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution La Trobe University Bundoora Victoria Australia

39. Department of Biology Benedictine College Atchison Kansas USA

40. Department of Biology Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

41. INTA‐UNPA‐CONICET Santa Cruz Argentina

42. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia

43. CSIRO Environment Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

44. Department of Physiological Diversity UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig Germany

45. National Centre for Biological Sciences Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bengaluru Karnataka India

46. School of Biology University of Leeds Leeds UK

47. Department of Biology, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA

48. Lancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK

49. Kellogg Biological Station Michigan State University Hickory Corners Michigan USA

50. Department of Terrestrial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology Wageningen The Netherlands

51. Ecology & Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland

Abstract

AbstractHuman activities are altering ecological communities around the globe. Understanding the implications of these changes requires that we consider the composition of those communities. However, composition can be summarized by many metrics which in turn are influenced by different ecological processes. For example, incidence‐based metrics strongly reflect species gains or losses, while abundance‐based metrics are minimally affected by changes in the abundance of small or uncommon species. Furthermore, metrics might be correlated with different predictors. We used a globally distributed experiment to examine variation in species composition within 60 grasslands on six continents. Each site had an identical experimental and sampling design: 24 plots × 4 years. We expressed compositional variation within each site—not across sites—using abundance‐ and incidence‐based metrics of the magnitude of dissimilarity (Bray–Curtis and Sorensen, respectively), abundance‐ and incidence‐based measures of the relative importance of replacement (balanced variation and species turnover, respectively), and species richness at two scales (per plot‐year [alpha] and per site [gamma]). Average compositional variation among all plot‐years at a site was high and similar to spatial variation among plots in the pretreatment year, but lower among years in untreated plots. For both types of metrics, most variation was due to replacement rather than nestedness. Differences among sites in overall within‐site compositional variation were related to several predictors. Environmental heterogeneity (expressed as the CV of total aboveground plant biomass in unfertilized plots of the site) was an important predictor for most metrics. Biomass production was a predictor of species turnover and of alpha diversity but not of other metrics. Continentality (measured as annual temperature range) was a strong predictor of Sorensen dissimilarity. Metrics of compositional variation are moderately correlated: knowing the magnitude of dissimilarity at a site provides little insight into whether the variation is driven by replacement processes. Overall, our understanding of compositional variation at a site is enhanced by considering multiple metrics simultaneously. Monitoring programs that explicitly incorporate these implications, both when designing sampling strategies and analyzing data, will have a stronger ability to understand the compositional variation of systems and to quantify the impacts of human activities.

Funder

National Science Foundation

University of Minnesota

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3