Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma without immediate completion lymph node dissection

Author:

,van der Ploeg A P T1,van Akkooi A C J1,Rutkowski P2,Cook M3,Nieweg O E4,Rossi C R5,Testori A6,Suciu S7,Verhoef C1,Eggermont A M M8

Affiliation:

1. Erasmus University Medical Centre—Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2. M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

3. Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK

4. Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5. Veneto Institute of Oncology—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico and University of Padua, Padua, Italy

6. European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

7. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium

8. Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Abstract

Abstract Background The therapeutic value of immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for sentinel node (SN)-positive melanoma is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of immediate CLND on the outcome of patients with SN-positive melanoma. Methods Patients with SN metastases treated between 1993 and 2008 at ten cancer centres from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group were included in this retrospective study. Maximum tumour size, intranodal location and penetrative depth of SN metastases were measured. Outcome in those who had CLND was compared with that in patients who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy. Results Of 1174 patients with SN-positive melanoma, 1113 (94·8 per cent) underwent CLND and 61 (5·2 per cent) did not. Median follow-up for the two groups was 34 and 48 months respectively. In univariable survival analysis, CLND did not significantly influence disease-specific survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0·89, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·58 to 1·37; P = 0·600). However, patients who did not undergo CLND had more favourable prognostic factors. Matched-pair analysis, with matching for age, Breslow thickness, tumour ulceration and SN tumour burden, showed that CLND had no influence on survival (HR 0·86, 0·46 to 1·61; P = 0·640). After adjusting for prognostic factors in multivariable survival analyses, no difference in survival was found. Conclusion In these two cohorts of patients with SN-positive melanoma and prognostic heterogeneity, outcome was not influenced by CLND.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3