Acid‐suppressive drugs: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of their nocturnal acid‐inhibitory effect

Author:

Zou Shupeng1ORCID,Ouyang Mengling1ORCID,Cheng Qian1ORCID,Shi Xuan1ORCID,Sun Minghui1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan Hubei Province China

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsAcid‐suppressive drugs (ASDs) are widely used in many gastric acid‐associated diseases. Nocturnal acid breakthrough has been a common problem of many ASDs, such as proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2‐receptor antagonists (H2RAs). Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are expected to solve this continuing conundrum. This article examined major ASDs and compared them with placebo in terms of nocturnal acid‐inhibitory effects, using a network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsTo compare the effectiveness of major ASDs, a Bayesian network meta‐analysis (NMA) was applied to process data extracted from RCTs. The plausible ranking for each regimen and some subgroups were assessed by surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).ResultsFifty‐five RCTs were conducted with 2015 participants. In terms of nocturnal acid‐inhibitory effects, the overall results showed that tegoprazan (SUCRA 91.8%) and vonoprazan (SUCRA 91.0%) had the best performance, followed by new PPIs (including tenatoprazole and ilaprazole) (SUCRA 76.6%), additional H2RAs once at bedtime (AHB) (SUCRA 61.3%), isomer PPIs (including esomeprazole and dexlansoprazole) (SUCRA 38.6%), revaprazan (SUCRA 34.7%), traditional PPIs (including omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole) (SUCRA 32.6%), H2RAs (SUCRA 23.1%), and placebo (SUCRA 0.3%). In some subgroups, the nocturnal acid‐inhibitory effect of vonoprazan or tegoprazan was better than most of the other regimens, even new PPIs and AHB.ConclusionsThis is the first study to compare the effect of ASDs on inhibiting nocturnal acid breakthrough. Overall, in terms of nocturnal acid‐inhibitory effect, vonoprazan and tegoprazan had an advantage against other regimens including H2RAs, isomer PPIs, traditional PPIs, AHB, and new PPIs. Even in some subgroups, such as language classification (English), types of study design (crossover‐RCT), age (≤40 years), BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), continent (Asia and North America), disease status (health), the duration of therapy (2 weeks), and time of administration (at daytime or at night‐time), the nocturnal acid‐inhibitory effect of vonoprazan or tegoprazan were better than most regimens, even AHB and new PPIs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3