Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacy University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital Birmingham Alabama USA
2. Department of Research Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas Beaumont Texas USA
3. Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine Birmingham Alabama USA
4. Division of Cardiology Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundVascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti‐angiogenics, are first‐line therapies for advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Although TKIs have a greater potential for off‐target adverse effects compared with bevacizumab (anti‐angiogenics), a direct comparison of the risk of cardiovascular adverse events between these two types of therapies has not been performed.ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of and characterize cardiovascular adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving TKIs versus bevacizumab.MethodsThis cohort study included adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received first‐line TKIs (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or bevacizumab at two academic medical centers and one community cancer center from September 2018 to August 2021. The primary outcome was risk of cardiovascular adverse events. Major secondary outcomes included the incidence of individual types of cardiovascular adverse events and risk factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).ResultsThe study included 221 patients (159 TKI patients; 62 bevacizumab patients). At a median follow‐up of 5 months, the probability of cardiovascular adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.58–1.24; p = 0.390). The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events was highest in patients receiving lenvatinib (sub‐distribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.02–2.30) compared with those receiving sorafenib (reference) or bevacizumab (SHR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.68–1.64) after adjustment for comorbidities, liver transplant status, and presence of portal vein thrombosis at baseline. Cardiovascular adverse events were observed in 151 (68%) patients, and MACE were observed in 27 (12%) patients. Risk factors associated with MACE were hypertension (SHR: 3.5; 95% CI: 0.9087–15.83; p = 0.086), prior history of MACE (SHR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.83–4.87; p = 0.124), and tobacco use (SHR: 2.85; 95% CI: 0.90–8.97; p = 0.074).ConclusionsCardiovascular risk was not significantly different between TKIs and bevacizumab. Lenvatinib appears to have the highest risk of cardiovascular adverse events among these first‐line VEGF inhibitors.
Reference31 articles.
1. National Cancer Institute.Cancer stat facts: liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer. Accessed May 16 2023.https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/livibd.html
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.Hepatocellular carcinoma (version 1.2023). Accessed May 16 2023.https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/hcc.pdf
3. Mechanisms of VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) Inhibitor–Associated Hypertension and Vascular Disease
4. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
5. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial