How platformisation transforms the psychological profession: Reflections from a proposal of indicators for the classification of psychological platforms

Author:

Gambirasio Maddalena1ORCID,Ivaldi Silvia1,Scaratti Giuseppe1

Affiliation:

1. Università degli Studi di Bergamo Bergamo Italy

Abstract

AbstractThis article is part of a research context that examines the impact of new technologies on psychological practice. We argue that the use of technological mediators in the execution of the psychological profession goes beyond mere modifications to methods and tools, transforming the very nature of the discipline and influencing the associated professional identity. Specifically, our focus is on ‘psychological platforms’ as emerging work contexts that represent a relatively recent but rapidly growing phenomenon. Beginning with what is present in the literature on the subject of platform classification, this research project is intended to create functional and useful indicators for an analysis of psychological platforms. Based on these indicators, it is possible to reflect on the impact that the various characteristics of psychological platforms have on the psychological profession and psychological professionals themselves. In doing so, we seek to address the following research questions: (a) What are the main characteristics of psychological platforms, (b) which dimensions of the psychological profession are influenced by the use of a given platform in conducting psychological interventions and (c) how does the platformisation of the psychological profession affect the role of the psychologist? Our analysis is based on an in‐depth literature review regarding the platforms, followed by a desk analysis of 44 psychological platforms operating in the Italian context. By adopting this perspective, this article illuminates the dynamics shaping psychological practice in the digital era and suggests guidelines for future research in this continually evolving field.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference48 articles.

1. Priorities for the US Health Community Responding to COVID-19

2. Online counseling: The Internet and mental health treatment.

3. Arcidiacono D. &Pais I.(2016).Reciprocità fiducia e relazioni nei servizi di mobilità condivisa: un'analisi sul car pooling di BlaBlaCar. Conference SISEC. Retrieved fromhttps://www.sisec.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Arcidiacono-Pais-Car-pooling-bla-bla-car-full-paper-SISEC.pdf

4. Online Counseling

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3