Associations between perceptions of shared decision making and health among hysterectomy patients: A prospective observational study

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate patient and clinical factors that are associated with perceptions of shared decision making between hysterectomy patients and surgeons and to evaluate associations between shared decision making and postoperative health.MethodsThis study is based on a prospective cohort scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions in Vancouver, Canada. Validated patient‐reported outcomes assessed shared decision making, pelvic health, depression, and pain. Regression analyses measured the association between perceptions of shared decision making with patient and clinical factors. Then, associations between shared decision making with postoperative pelvic health, pain and depression were evaluated using regression analysis and adjusted for patient and clinical factors.ResultsIn this study, 308 participants completed preoperative measures, and a subset of 146 participants also completed the postoperative measures. More than 50% of participants reported less than optimal shared decision making scores. No significant associations were identified between patients' perceptions of shared decision making with patients' age, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, indication for surgery, or preoperative depression and pain. Regression analyses found that higher/better self‐reported shared decision making scores were associated with fewer postoperative pelvic organ symptoms (P = 0.01).ConclusionMany patients' reporting lower than optimal scores on the shared decision making instrument highlight the opportunity to improve surgeon‐patient communication in this surgical cohort. Strengthening shared decision making between surgeons and their patients may be associated with improved self‐reported postoperative health.