Comparative survival analysis of bladder preservation therapy versus radical cystectomy in muscle‐invasive bladder cancer

Author:

Kang Nai‐Wen1,Feng Yin‐Hsun1ORCID,Lin Kuei‐Li2,Chen Yi‐Chen3,Ho Chung‐Han34,Yang Ching‐Chieh256ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Chi Mei Medical Center Tainan Taiwan

2. Department of Radiation Oncology Chi Mei Medical Center Tainan Taiwan

3. Department of Medical Research Chi Mei Medical Center Tainan Taiwan

4. Department of Information Management Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology Tainan Taiwan

5. Department of Pharmacy Chia‐Nan University of Pharmacy and Science Tainan Taiwan

6. School of Medicine, College of Medicine National Sun Yat‐sen University Kaohsiung Taiwan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBladder preservation therapy is an alternative to radical cystectomy in patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The purpose of this study is to compare survival outcomes between bladder preservation therapy and radical cystectomy in MIBC patients using an Asian nationwide cancer registry database.MethodsFrom the Taiwan Cancer Registry database and the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified bladder cancer patients from 2008 to 2018. The patients with urothelial carcinoma and clinical stage T2‐T4aN0‐1 M0 were included. Propensity score matching by age, gender, clinical stage, cT classification, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was used between those receiving bladder preservation therapy or radical cystectomy. Overall survival (OS), cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and disease‐free survival (DFS) were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to determine the predictive factors of OS, CSS, and DFS.ResultsFollowing the propensity score matching, 393 MIBC patients were analyzed, 131 (33.3%) receiving bladder preservation therapy and 262 (66.7%) receiving radical cystectomy. After 5 years of the follow‐up period the overall duration was with a median of 15.6 months. The treatment groups did not differ significantly in OS, CSS, and DFS (p = 0.2681, 0.7208, and 0.3616, respectively). In multivariable Cox regression models, bladder preservation therapy remained non‐inferior to radical cystectomy in OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–1.50; p = 0.6689), CSS (aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.72–1.57; p = 0.7728), and DFS (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.46–1.27; p = 0.2929). Additionally, among patients ≥80 years, the use of bladder preservation therapy compared with radical cystectomy resulted in an equivalent OS, CSS and DSS.ConclusionIn Asian populations, bladder preservation therapy yielded similar survival outcomes as radical cystectomy in MIBC patients. Based on the results, it is evident that a multidisciplinary approach and shared decision‐making are recommended for bladder cancer treatment.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3