Beliefs regarding the use of imaging among patients with low back pain: A cross‐sectional study in the context of a middle‐income country

Author:

Diniz Leandro M.1,Lemes Ítalo R.23ORCID,Freire Ana P. C. F.4ORCID,Guimarães Ana F.1,Ferreira Lucas A. C.1,Franco Marcia R.5,Verhagen Arianne P.6,Simoneau Guy7,Pinto Rafael Z.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Therapy Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) Belo Horizonte Brazil

2. Department of Physical Therapy School of Technology and Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Presidente Prudente Brazil

3. Department of Physical Therapy Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein (FICSAE) São Paulo Brazil

4. Department of Health Sciences Central Washington University Ellensburg Washington USA

5. Department of Physical Therapy Centro Universitário UNA Belo Horizonte Brazil

6. Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health University of Technology Sydney Sydney Australia

7. Department of Physical Therapy Marquette University Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPatients with low back pain may play an active role in the prescription of excessive spine imaging.ObjectiveTo determine the proportion of patients with low back pain who have beliefs not aligned with current evidence regarding the use of imaging and to identify factors associated with these beliefs.DesignSecondary analysis of baseline data of a previously published randomized clinical trial.SettingOutpatient physical therapy clinic in a middle‐income country.PatientsIndividuals with non‐specific low back pain.MethodsOutcome variables were two statements assessing the extent of patient agreement on the need for imaging in the management of low back pain. The predictor variables were age, educational level, duration of symptoms, disability level, pain intensity in the last 24 hours, beliefs about inevitable consequences of low back pain (assessed using the Back Belief Questionnaire), and having received imaging previously. Multivariable logistic models were used for data analysis.Main Outcome Measure(s)Level of agreement with Statement 1: X‐rays or scans are necessary to get the best medical care for low back pain and Statement 2: Everyone with low back pain should have spine imaging.ResultsA total of 159 patients were included. Of these, 88.1% believed that imaging was necessary for the best medical care for low back pain and 62.9% believed that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging. Lower scores on the Back Belief Questionnaire were associated with beliefs that imaging was necessary (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.99) and low education level was associated with the belief that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging (OR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.38, 6.61), after controlling for potential confounders.ConclusionNearly 90% of patients believe that spine imaging is necessary for the management of low back pain. Beliefs about the inevitable consequences of low back pain and low education level may be factors that need to be considered when developing new interventions.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3