Investigating the latent structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire to assess ICD‐11 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD in an adult civilian sample during the Ukraine war

Author:

Ho Grace W. K.1ORCID,Vang Maria Louison2ORCID,Martsenkovskyi Dmytro34ORCID,Karatzias Thanos5,Ben‐Ezra Menachem6,McElroy Eoin7ORCID,Redican Enya7ORCID,Cloitre Marylene89,Lorberg Boris10,Hyland Philip11ORCID,Shevlin Mark7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong

2. Centre for Psychotraumatology University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

3. Department of Psychiatry and Narcology Bogomolets National Medical University Kyiv Ukraine

4. SI Institute of Psychiatry Forensic Psychiatric Examination and Drug Monitoring of Ministry of Health of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine

5. School of Health & Social Care Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh United Kingdom

6. School of Social Work Ariel University Ariel Israel

7. School of Psychology Ulster University Derry Northern Ireland United Kingdom

8. National Center for PTSD, Dissemination and Training Division VA Palo Alto Health Care System Palo Alto California USA

9. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences Stanford University Stanford California USA

10. Department of Psychiatry UMass Chan Medical School Massachusetts USA

11. Department of Psychology Maynooth University Kildare Ireland

Abstract

AbstractThe symptom structure of ICD‐11 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) and the validity of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) are yet to be tested among civilians in an active war zone. The present investigation examined the factor structure of the ITQ, the internal consistency of observed scores, and their associations with demographic characteristics and war‐related experiences using a nationwide sample of 2,004 adults from the general population of Ukraine approximately 6 months after the full‐scale Russian invasion in 2022. Overall, rates of endorsement across all symptom clusters were high. The mean total number of war‐related stressors reported was 9.07 (SD = 4.35, range: 1–26). Internal reliability was good for all six ITQ subscales, Cronbach's αs = .73–.88, and the correlated six‐factor model was found to provide the best representation of the latent structure of the ITQ in the present sample based on fit indices. There was evidence of a dose–response relationship, with increasing scores on all symptom clusters associated with higher total reported war‐related stressors.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3