Differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction management between care providers: an international survey

Abstract

AbstractAimsHeart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by growing incidence and poor outcomes. A large majority of HFpEF patients are cared by non‐cardiologists. The availability of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as recommended therapy raises the importance of prompt and accurate identification and treatment of HFpEF across diverse healthcare settings. We evaluated HFpEF management across specialties through a survey targeting cardiologists, HF specialists, and non‐cardiologists.Methods and resultsAn independent web‐based survey was distributed globally between May and July 2023. We performed a post‐hoc analysis, comparing cardiologists, HF specialists, and non‐cardiologists. A total of 1460 physicians (61% male, median age 41[34–49]) from 95 countries completed the survey; 20% were HF specialists, 65% cardiologists, and 15% non‐cardiologists. Compared with HF specialists, non‐cardiologists and cardiologists were less likely to use natriuretic peptides (p = 0.003) and HFpEF scores (p = 0.004) for diagnosis, and were also less likely to have access to or consider specific echocardiographic parameters (p < 0.001) for identifying HFpEF. Diastolic stress tests were used in less than 30% of the cases, regardless of the specialty (p = 1.12). Multidrug treatment strategies were similar across different specialties. While SGLT2i and diuretics were the preferred drugs, angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors were the least frequently prescribed in all three groups. However, when constrained to choose one drug, the proportion of physicians favoring SGLT2i varied significantly among specialties (66% HF specialists, 52% cardiologists, 51% non‐cardiologists). Additionally, 10% of non‐cardiologists and 8% of cardiologists considered beta blocker the drug of choice for HFpEF.ConclusionSignificant differences among specialty groups were observed in HFpEF management, particularly in the diagnostic work‐up. Our results highlight a substantial risk of underdiagnosis and undertreatment of HFpEF patients, especially among non‐HF specialists.