A pipeline for rapidly evaluating activity and inferring mechanisms of action of prospective antifungal compounds

Author:

Kraut‐Cohen Judith1ORCID,Frenkel Omer2,Covo Shay3,Marcos‐Hadad Evgeniya3,Carmeli Shmuel4,Belausov Eduard5,Minz Dror1,Cytryn Eddie1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization Volcani Center Rishon LeZion Israel

2. Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization Volcani Center Rishon LeZion Israel

3. Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment Hebrew University Rehovot Israel

4. Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv Israel

5. Confocal Microscopy Unit, Agricultural Research Organization Volcani Center Rishon LeZion Israel

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDFungal phytopathogens are a significant threat to crops and food security, and there is a constant need to develop safe and effective compounds that antagonize them. In‐planta assays are complex and tedious and are thus not suitable for initial high‐throughput screening of new candidate antifungal compounds. We propose an in vitro screening pipeline that integrates five rapid quantitative and qualitative methods to estimate the efficacy and mode of action of prospective antifungal compounds.RESULTSThe pipeline was evaluated using five documented antifungal compounds (benomyl, catechol, cycloheximide, 2,4‐diacetylphloroglucinol, and phenylacetic acid) that have different modes of action and efficacy, against the model soilborne fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis cucumerinum. We initially evaluated the five compounds' ability to inhibit fungal growth and metabolic activity using green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐labeled F. oxysporum and PrestoBlue staining, respectively, in multiwell plate assays. We tested the compounds' inhibition of both conidial germination and hyphal elongation. We then employed FUN‐1 and SYTO9/propidium iodide staining, coupled to confocal microscopy, to differentiate between fungal growth inhibition and death at the cellular level. Finally, using a reactive oxygen species (ROS)‐detection assay, we were able to quantify ROS production in response to compound application.CONCLUSIONSCollectively, the proposed pipeline provides a wide array of quantitative and qualitative data on the tested compounds that can help pinpoint promising novel compounds; these can then be evaluated more vigorously using in planta screening assays. © 2024 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3