Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Science KU Leuven Campus Kulak‐Kortrijk Kortrijk Belgium
2. Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics Ghent University Ghent Belgium
3. Department of Computer Science and Information Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary
4. Department of Mathematics Babeş‐Bolyai University Cluj‐Napoca Romania
Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we use theoretical and computational tools to continue our investigation of ‐hamiltonian graphs, that is, graphs in which the removal of any pair of adjacent vertices yields a hamiltonian graph, and their interplay with ‐hamiltonian graphs, that is, graphs in which every vertex‐deleted subgraph is hamiltonian. Perhaps surprisingly, there exist graphs that are both ‐ and ‐hamiltonian, yet non‐hamiltonian, for example, the Petersen graph. Grünbaum conjectured that every planar ‐hamiltonian graph must itself be hamiltonian; Thomassen disproved this conjecture. Here we show that even planar graphs that are both ‐ and ‐hamiltonian need not be hamiltonian, and that the number of such graphs grows at least exponentially. Motivated by results of Aldred, McKay, and Wormald, we determine for every integer that is not 14 or 17 whether there exists a ‐hypohamiltonian, that is non‐hamiltonian and ‐hamiltonian, graph of order , and characterise all orders for which such cubic graphs and such snarks exist. We also describe the smallest cubic planar graph which is ‐hypohamiltonian, as well as the smallest planar ‐hypohamiltonian graph of girth 5. We conclude with open problems and by correcting two inaccuracies from the first article.
Funder
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven
Subject
Geometry and Topology,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics