A study protocol of a comparative mixed study of the T‐Control catheter

Author:

Medina‐Polo José1,Salamanca‐Castro Ana Belén1,Ramallo‐Fariña Yolanda23,Mòdol‐Vidal Max4ORCID,Valcárcel‐Nazco Cristina23,Armas‐Moreno Clara4,Perestelo‐Pérez Lilisbeth3,García‐Pérez Lidia23,García‐Bello Miguel Ángel235,Luque‐González Manuel4ORCID,Serrano‐Muñoz Marta4,Pérez‐García Santiago6

Affiliation:

1. Urology Service 12 de Octubre University Hospital Madrid Spain

2. Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Evaluation Unit (SESCS) Canary Islands Health Service Tenerife Spain

3. Canary Islands Research Group (Canary Islands Health Service) Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS) Tenerife Spain

4. Scientific Department Rethink Medical SL Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain

5. Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology Department University of La Laguna (ULL) Tenerife Spain

6. InveCuid Group, Imas12 Institute 12 de Octubre University Hospital Madrid Spain

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFoley catheters have been subject to limited development in the last few decades. They fulfil their basic function of draining urine from the bladder but cause other associated problems. T‐Control is a new silicone Foley catheter with an integrated fluid control valve whose design aims to reduce the risks associated with bladder catheterization by a multifactorial approach. The general purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness, comfort, and experience of the patient catheterized with T‐Control® compared with patients with a conventional Foley catheter.Study DesignThis trial is a mixed‐method study comprising a two‐arm, pilot comparative study with random allocation to T‐Control catheter or traditional Foley catheter in patients with long‐term catheterization and a study with qualitative methodology, through discussion groups.EndpointsThe comfort and acceptability of the T‐Control® device (qualitative) and the quality of life related to self‐perceived health (quantitative) will be analysed as primary endpoints. As secondary endpoints, the following will be analysed: magnitude and rate of infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic); days free of infection; indication of associated antibiotic treatments; determination of biofilm; number of catheter‐related adverse events; use of each type of catheterization's healthcare resources; and level of satisfaction and workload of health professionals.Patients and MethodsEligible patients are male and female adults aged ≥18 years, who require a change of long‐term bladder catheter. The estimated sample size is 50 patients. Patient follow‐up includes both the time of catheter insertion and its removal or change 4 weeks later, plus the time until the discussion groups take place.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3