Technical Challenges for Laryngeal Electromyography

Author:

Lin R. Jun1ORCID,Munin Michael C.2,Belsky Michael3,Smith Brandon4,Grose Elysia1,Nisenbaum Rosane56,Rosen Clark A.7ORCID,Smith Libby J.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania U.S.A.

3. Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Stanford University Stanford California U.S.A.

4. Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania U.S.A.

5. MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, UCSF Voice & Swallowing Center University of California San Francisco San Francisco California U.S.A.

Abstract

Background/ObjectiveLaryngeal electromyography (LEMG) is a useful diagnostic test in the evaluation of vocal fold paralysis (VFP). This study investigates factors that can make LEMG challenging to perform.MethodsPatients with subacute unilateral VFP presented for LEMG were prospectively enrolled. Demographic data including BMI, previous neck surgery, and anatomic factors were collected. Patient‐reported pain related to the procedure was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Electromyographer and otolaryngologist recorded a consensus rating of the perceived difficulty in performing the test and confidence in using the results for clinical decision‐making.ResultsA total of 111 patients (56.8% female) were enrolled between August 2015 and August 2018. The mean age was 55 ± 14 years, and the average body mass index (BMI) was 28.5 ± 6.4. The mean patient‐reported VAS score for pain was 35 ± 24. Notably, 31.2% of the tests were considered “very easy,” 32.1% were considered “mildly challenging” and 23.9% and 12.8% were considered “moderately challenging” and “extremely challenging,” respectively, by the clinicians. Common factors affecting LEMG difficulty included poorly palpable surface anatomy (50.5%) and patient intolerance (15.6%). Clinicians felt confident in 76.1% of the test findings. Bivariate analyses showed that prior neck surgery is associated with elevated VAS (p = 0.02), but clinician‐perceived difficulty of performing the test is not associated with elevated VAS scores (p = 0.55).ConclusionsMajority of LEMG tests are well tolerated by patients. Physicians reported more confidence using LEMG for clinical decision‐making when the test was easier to perform. Difficult surface anatomy and patient intolerance affects clinician confidence in integrating the test results with clinical care.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 134:831–834, 2024

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3