Affiliation:
1. University College of London London UK
2. University of Trento Trento Italy
Abstract
AbstractMan‐made hazards, such as fire, explosions, or impacts, may induce the progressive collapse of structures, in which the localised failure spreads from the single affected structural component to other parts of the structure. A typical approach to model progressive collapse consists in performing static column removal analyses considering a Dynamic Increase Factor (DIF), whose determination becomes paramount to account for the dynamic effects related to a sudden column loss scenario. Current recommendations on the definition of such factor mainly consider a beam‐type collapse in non‐linear analyses, though different mechanisms, e.g., column buckling, may govern progressive collapse events. This paper presents the determination of the DIFs through a numerical procedure for five steel structures with an increasing number of storeys. Both global and local imperfections are modeled to account for the geometric non‐linearities of the structure and column buckling. DIF values are obtained considering two different Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs), suited for describing beam‐type and column‐type mechanisms respectively. The evaluated DIFs are compared with the values recommended in the current UFC design prescriptions for progressive collapse, and considerations on the choice of the appropriate DIF values are provided.
Funder
UK Research and Innovation
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science