Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering

Author:

Terman Stanley A.1ORCID,Steinberg Karl E.2,Hinerman Nathaniel3

Affiliation:

1. Caring Advocates Sausalito California USA

2. Shiley Haynes Institute for Palliative Care California State University, San Marcos San Marcos California USA

3. School of Undergraduate Studies Department of Psychology, Golden Gate University San Francisco California USA

Abstract

AbstractPatients living with advanced dementia (PLADs) face several challenges to attain the goal of avoiding prolonged dying with severe suffering. One is how to determine when PLADs’ current suffering becomes severe enough to cease all life‐sustaining treatments, including withdrawing assistance with oral feeding and hydrating, a controversial order. This article broadens the concept of suffering by including suffering that cannot be observed contemporaneously and the suffering of loved ones. Four paradigm shifts operationalize these concepts. During advance care planning, patients can judge which future clinical conditions would cause severe suffering. To decide when to allow patients to die, treating physicians/providers only need to assess if patients have reached patients' previously judged, qualifying conditions. Questions: Will this protocol prevent PLADs’ prolonged dying with suffering? Deter early‐stage dementia patients from committing preemptive suicide? Sway decision‐making surrogates from withholding life‐sustaining treatments from patients with middle‐stage dementia? Provoke providers’ resistance to relinquish their traditional, unilateral authority to determine patients’ suffering?

Publisher

Wiley

Reference40 articles.

1. Can an effective end‐of‐life intervention for advanced dementia be viewed as moral?

2. AMA Code of Ethics.Opinion 2.20—Withholding or Withdrawing Life‐Sustaining Medical Treatment. Accessed 04 Sept. 2021. (Also cited as: American Medical Association. “Opinion 2.20 Withholding or withdrawing life‐sustaining medical treatment.” Code of Medical Ethics (2014): 35‐36.)https://journalofethics.ama‐assn.org/article/ama‐code‐medical‐ethics‐opinions‐care‐end‐life/2013‐12

3. HR 5067. Patient Self‐Determination Act of 1990. Accessed 04 Sept 2021.https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st‐congress/house‐bill/5067/text

4. Alzheimer disease and pre-emptive suicide

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Navigating late‐stage dementia: A perspective from the Alzheimer's Association;Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring;2024-01

2. Commentary to: “Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering.” Timely dying, suffering in dementia, and a role for family and professional caregivers in preventing it;Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring;2024-01

3. Broadening the concept of suffering is a less than adequate strategy for respecting patients in advanced dementia;Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring;2024-01

4. Response to Stanley Terman: Too little, too late;Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring;2024-01

5. A Review of Terman's “Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering”;Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3