Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection 14‐day concomitant quadruple therapy versus triple therapy: A parallel double‐blind randomized controlled trial

Author:

Loghmari Mohamed Hichem1ORCID,Aissaoui Firas1,Guediche Arwa1,Bouhlel Wided1,Zakhama Mejda1,Chaabene Nabil B.1,Rehaiem Amel1,Ben Abdeljalil Nouha2,Njima Manel2,Zakhama Abdelfetteh2,Kadri Yosr3,Mastouri Maha3,Safer Leila1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepato‐Gastroenterology Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia

2. Department of Pathological Anatomy Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia

3. Microbiology Laboratory Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsSuccessful Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication with the traditional 7‐day course of proton pump inhibitor triple therapy is declining. Prolonging therapy to 14 days is associated with better eradication rates. Most learned societies recommend concomitant quadruple therapy (QC) as a first‐line alternative therapy for this bacterial infection. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of triple therapy (TT) and QC for the eradication of Hp infection.MethodsA parallel double‐blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. The diagnosis of Hp infection was made by pathological examination of gastric biopsies. Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: either QC (esomeprazole 80 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, clarithromycin 1000 mg, and metronidazole 1000 mg daily) or triple therapy (esomeprazole 80 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, and clarithromycin 1000 mg daily in divided doses) for 14 days. The efficacy of the treatment is defined by Hp eradication attested by a negative breath test performed 6 weeks after the completion of treatment. Treatment outcomes were compared using the chi‐square test, while binary logistic regression identified predictors of treatment failure.ResultsNinety‐two patients were included. Forty‐two patients belonged to the QC group and 50 to the TT group. No significant difference was noted between the two groups concerning the rate of Hp eradication either by intention to treat (81% vs. 72% respectively, p = 0.31) or per protocol (81.6% vs. 76.1% respectively, p = 0.54). Likewise, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of tolerance to treatment (59.5% for QC vs. 58% for TT, p = 0.88). No factor has been associated with treatment failure.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the rate of HP eradication between the QC and the 14‐day triple therapy. Neither regimen should be used topically because of their low eradication rates.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3