Captive breeding of European freshwater mussels as a conservation tool: A review

Author:

Geist Juergen1ORCID,Thielen Frankie2ORCID,Lavictoire Louise3ORCID,Hoess Rebecca1,Altmueller Reinhard4,Baudrimont Magalie5ORCID,Blaize Christine6,Campos Miquel78,Carroll Paul9,Daill Daniel10,Degelmann Wolfgang11,Dettmer Rainer12,Denic Marco13,Dury Pierrick14,de Eyto Elvira15,Grunicke Felix16,Gumpinger Clemens10,Jakobsen Per J.17,Kaldma Katrin1819,Klaas Kunnar19,Legeay Alexia5,Mageroy Jon Hamner20ORCID,Moorkens Evelyn A.21,Motte Grégory22,Nakamura Keiko2324ORCID,Ondina Paz25ORCID,Österling Martin26ORCID,Pichler‐Scheder Christian10,Spisar Ondřej27,Reis Joaquim28ORCID,Schneider Lea D.29,Schwarzer Arno30,Selheim Heidi31,Soler Joaquín32ORCID,Taskinen Jouni33ORCID,Taylor John34,Strachan Ben35ORCID,Wengström Niklas36,Zając Tadeusz37ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Freising Germany

2. Fondation Hëllef fir d'Natur/natur & ëmwelt Marnach Luxembourg

3. Freshwater Biological Association, YMCA North Campus Newby Bridge UK

4. Lachendorf Germany

5. Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP Pessac France

6. Bretagne Vivante – Société pour l’ Étude et la Protection de la Nature en Bretagne (SEPNB) Brest France

7. Freshwater Mussel Breeding Laboratory of Lake Banyoles Banyoles Spain

8. Wildlife Conservation Medicine Research Group (WildCoM), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Catalonia Spain

9. Friend of the River Clodiagh Group Kilmeaden Water Plant Kilmeaden Ireland

10. Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering – blattfisch e.U. Wels Austria

11. Bund Naturschutz Hof Hof Germany

12. Hannover Germany

13. Landschaftspflegeverband Passau e.V. Passau Germany

14. Fédération de Pêche du Finistère, Pisciculture du Favot Brasparts France

15. Marine Institute, Furnace Newport Co. Mayo Ireland

16. Institute of Hydrobiology Technical University of Dresden Dresden Germany

17. Department of Bioscience University of Bergen Bergen Norway

18. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Estonian University of Life Sciences Tartu Estonia

19. State Forest Management Centre Haljala Municipality Lääne‐Viru County Estonia

20. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Oslo Norway

21. Trinity Centre for the Environment, School of Natural Sciences, Department of Zoology, Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin Ireland

22. Public Service of Wallonia, Agriculture, Natural Resources and the Environment DEMNA, Directorate of Nature and Water Gembloux Belgium

23. Environmental Service Department Sociedad Aragonesa de Gestión Agroambiental (SARGA) Zaragoza Spain

24. Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology University of Valencia Valencia Spain

25. Department of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology University of Santiago de Compostela, Campus Terra Lugo Spain

26. Biology, Institution of Environmental and Life Sciences Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden

27. BIVALVIA s.r.o. Zábřeh Czech Republic

28. Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE)/Aquatic Research Network (ARNET) Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal

29. The Rural Economy and Agricultural Society Eldsberga Sweden

30. Lüsslingen Switzerland

31. Biologische Station Städte Region Aachen e.V. Stolberg Germany

32. Université de Tours, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) l’UMR 7324 CItés, TERritoires, Environnement et Sociétés (CITERES) Tours France

33. Department of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland

34. Cynrig Fish Culture Unit Llanfryanch UK

35. Kielder Salmon Centre Environment Agency Northumberland UK

36. Swedish Anglers Association Göteborg Sweden

37. Institute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences Kraków Poland

Abstract

Abstract Freshwater mussels are declining throughout their range. Their important ecological functions along with insufficient levels of natural recruitment have prompted captive breeding for population augmentation and questions about the usefulness and applicability of such measures. This article reviews the current state of captive breeding and rearing programmes for freshwater mussels in Europe. It considers the various species, strategies, and techniques of propagation, as well as the different levels of effort required according to rearing method, highlighting the key factors of success. Within the last 30 years, 46 breeding activities in 16 European countries have been reported, mainly of Margaritifera margaritifera and Unio crassus. Some facilities propagate species that are in a very critical situation, such as Pseudunio auricularius, Unio mancus, and Unio ravoisieri, or multiple species concurrently. In some streams, the number of released captive‐bred mussels already exceeds the size of the remaining natural population. Rearing efforts range from highly intensive laboratory incubation to lower intensity methods using in‐river mussel cages or silos. Most breeding efforts are funded by national and EU LIFE(+) grants, are well documented, and consider the genetic integrity of the propagated mussels. Limited long‐term funding perspectives, the availability of experienced staff, water quality, and feeding/survival during early life stages are seen as the most important challenges. Successful captive breeding programmes need to be combined with restoration of the habitats into which the mussels are released. This work will benefit from an evidence‐based approach, knowledge exchange among facilities, and an overall breeding strategy comprising multiple countries and conservation units.

Funder

European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Aquatic Science

Reference80 articles.

1. Erfolgreiche Artenschutzmaßnahmen für die Flussperlmuschel Margaritifera margaritifera L. durch Reduzierung von unnatürlichen Feinsedimentfrachten ‐ Erfahrungen im Rahmen des Lutterprojekts [Successful species protection measures for the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) through the reduction of unnaturally high loading of silt and sand in running waters — experiences within the scope of the Lutterproject];Altmüller R.;Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen,2006

2. Who wins in the weaning process? Juvenile feeding morphology of two freshwater mussel species

3. Conservation of two endangered European freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae): a three‐year, semi‐natural breeding experiment;Araujo R.;Nautilus,2015

4. Buckets of muckets: A compact system for rearing juvenile freshwater mussels

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3