Bias in Intracellular Luminescence Thermometry: The Case of the Green Fluorescent Protein

Author:

Rodríguez‐Sevilla Paloma1,Spicer Graham23,Sagrera Ana4,Adam Alejandro P.5ORCID,Efeyan Alejo4,Jaque Daniel16ORCID,Thompson Sebastian A.78ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nanomaterials for Bioimaging Group (NanoBIG) Departamento de Física de Materiales Universidad Autónoma de Madrid C/ Francisco Tomás y Valiente 7 28049 Madrid Spain

2. Wellman Center for Photomedicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA 02114 USA

3. Harvard Medical School Harvard University Boston MA 02115 USA

4. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO) 28029 Madrid Spain

5. Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology and Department of Ophthalmology Albany Medical Center Albany NY 12208 USA

6. Nanomaterials for Bioimaging Group (NanoBIG) Instituto Ramon y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria IRYCIS Ctra Colmenar Km 9‐100 28034 Madrid Spain

7. Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies in Nanoscience (IMDEA Nanociencia) C/ Faraday 9 28049 Madrid Spain

8. Nanobiotechnology Unit Associated to the National Center for Biotechnology (CNB‐CSIC‐IMDEA) 28049 Madrid Spain

Abstract

AbstractMeasurement of intracellular temperature in a fast, accurate, reliable, and remote manner is crucial for the understanding of cellular processes. Nanothermometers based on the green fluorescence protein (GFP) are of special interest because intracellular temperature readouts can be obtained from the analysis of the polarization state of its luminescence. Despite the good results provided by GFP thermometers, the reliability of their intracellular thermal readouts is still a question of debate. Here, light is shed on this issue by introducing cell activity as a relevant bias mechanism that prevents the use of GFP for reliable intranuclear thermal measurements. Experimental evidence that this lack of reliability can affect not only GFP but also other widely used thermometers such as semiconductor nanocrystals is provided. It is discussed how differences observed between calibration curves obtained in presence and absence of cell activity can inform about the presence of bias. The presented results and discussion are aimed to warn the community working in intracellular thermometry and encourage authors to approach the issue in a conscious manner. The performance and reliability of the chosen intracellular thermometers must be judiciously assessed. This is the only way intracellular thermometry can progress and deliver indisputable results.

Funder

Albert Einstein Cancer Center

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3