Optimization of electromagnetic absorption properties based on graphene, carbon nanotubes, and Fe3O4 multidimensional composites

Abstract

AbstractExcellent electromagnetic wave loss and impedance matching are typical characteristics of superior‐performance electromagnetic wave (EMW) absorption materials. Changing the component ratios and multidimensional combinations of various absorbing materials is one of the best methods to improve absorption performance. This work used a convenient physical mixing approach to combine three wave‐absorbing materials with various dimensions to successfully prepare Graphene/carbon nanotubes/Fe3O4 (G/C/Fe3O4)/paraffin composites. One‐dimensional (1D) tube carbon nanotubes (CNTs) pierced two‐dimensional (2D) sheet graphene to form a strong three‐dimensional (3D) conductive network, enhancing interfacial polarization without introducing zero‐dimensional (0D) magnetic Nano‐Fe3O4. Nevertheless, because of their significant dielectric characteristics, the graphene/carbon nanotube (G/C) paraffin composites displayed low impedance matching and electromagnetic wave absorption properties. At a mass ratio of 1:1, the G/C/paraffin composites achieved an ideal reflection loss (RL) of −11.99 db and an impedance matching value of 0.59. Adding Fe3O4 improved the impedance matching and electromagnetic wave loss performance and promoted the formation of a non‐homogeneous interface, improving interfacial polarization and reflection. The G/C/Fe3O4/paraffin composite, with a mass ratio of 1:1:6 and a filler ratio of 20%, achieved an optimum reflection loss of −37.2 dB and an effective absorption bandwidth of 4.16 GHz. This work optimized and improved the performance of EMW materials practically and rapidly, providing a research method for the widespread application of superior‐performance electromagnetic wave absorption materials.Highlights The EMW absorption materials with various architectures. 1D CNTs pierced 2D sheet graphene to form a strong 3D conductive network. Adding Fe3O4 promoted the formation of a non‐homogeneous interface. Electromagnetic synergies and different structural combinations It achieved excellent impedance matching and electromagnetic loss performance.