Leveraging federalism for flexible and robust management of social‐ecological systems

Author:

Sims Charles1ORCID,Armsworth Paul R.2ORCID,Blackwood Julie3,Fitzpatrick Ben4,Kling David M.5,Lenhart Suzanne6ORCID,Neubert Michael7ORCID,Papeş Monica2,Sanchirico James8ORCID,Shea Katriona9ORCID,Springborn Michael8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Economics and Howard H. Baker Jr. Center for Public Policy University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA

2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA

3. Department of Mathematics and Statistics Williams College Williamstown Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Mathematics Loyola Marymount University Los Angeles California USA

5. Department of Applied Economics Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA

6. Department of Mathematics University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA

7. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Environmental Science and Policy University of California, Davis Davis California USA

9. Department of Biology Pennsylvania State University State College Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

Abstract Managing social‐ecological systems (SES) requires balancing the need to tailor actions to local heterogeneity and the need to work over large areas to accommodate the extent of SES. This balance is particularly challenging for policy since the level of government where the policy is being developed determines the extent and resolution of action. We make the case for a new research agenda focused on ecological federalism that seeks to address this challenge by capitalizing on the flexibility afforded by a federalist system of governance. Ecological federalism synthesizes the environmental federalism literature from law and economics with relevant ecological and biological literature to address a fundamental question: What aspects of SES should be managed by federal governments and which should be allocated to decentralized state governments? This new research agenda considers the bio‐geo‐physical processes that characterize state‐federal management tradeoffs for biodiversity conservation, resource management, infectious disease prevention, and invasive species control. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3