Centring justice in conceptualizing and improving access to urban nature

Author:

Langhans Kelley E.12ORCID,Echeverri Alejandra1234ORCID,Daws S. Caroline12ORCID,Moss Sydney N.5ORCID,Anderson Christopher B.6ORCID,Chaplin‐Kramer Rebecca7ORCID,Hendershot J. Nicholas12ORCID,Liu Lingling3,Mandle Lisa34ORCID,Nguyen Oliver12ORCID,Ou Suzanne X.12ORCID,Remme Roy P.38ORCID,Schmitt Rafael J. P.34ORCID,Vogl Adrian349ORCID,Daily Gretchen C.1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA

2. Center for Conservation Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA

3. The Natural Capital Project Stanford University Stanford California USA

4. Woods Institute for the Environment Stanford University Stanford California USA

5. Blum Center for Developing Economies The University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USA

6. Planet San Francisco California USA

7. WWF San Francisco California USA

8. Institute of Environmental Sciences Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

9. The World Bank Group Washington District of Columbia USA

Abstract

Abstract As humanity has become increasingly urban, a growing number of people have been deprived of access to nature and the benefits it provides. This is especially true for marginalized groups, who often live in neighbourhoods where nature has been so diminished and degraded that it provides fewer types, and much lower levels of benefits. We review the literatures on human–nature relationships, urban sustainability and justice to create an actionable definition of ‘access to nature’ that people can use to advocate for and guide investments that improve access to nature in urban contexts. We show how the interplay of three dimensions of justice—recognitional, procedural and distributional—determines access to nature in cities, and how these dimensions are core to increasing access to urban nature. We present a design thinking framework that centres justice in creating interventions for access to nature, together with questions that can guide the process of designing and implementing new interventions. Lastly, we illustrate how our framework can be operationalized by showcasing three case studies that improve access to nature to marginalized communities in the United States: Latino Outdoors, Sogorea Te′ Land Trust and the Nature Imagery in Prisons Project. We conclude by re‐affirming the importance of centring justice in improving access to nature, so that all people can enjoy the benefits that nature provides and lead healthy, fulfilling lives. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3