Denser and greener cities: Green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature

Author:

McDonald Robert I.123ORCID,Aronson Myla F. J.4ORCID,Beatley Timothy5,Beller Erin6,Bazo Micaela7,Grossinger Robin7,Jessup Kelsey8ORCID,Mansur Andressa V.910ORCID,Puppim de Oliveira José Antonio11ORCID,Panlasigui Stephanie7,Burg Joe7,Pevzner Nicholas12,Shanahan Danielle1314,Stoneburner Lauren7,Rudd Andrew15,Spotswood Erica7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Sustainability Science, The Nature Conservancy in Europe Berlin Germany

2. CUNY Institute for Demographic Research New York New York USA

3. Humboldt University Berlin Germany

4. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA

5. School of Architecture University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA

6. Real Estate & Workplace Services Sustainability Team Google Mountain View California USA

7. Urban Nature Lab San Francisco Estuary Institute Richmond California USA

8. The Nature Conservancy in California San Francisco California USA

9. Department of Anthropology University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA

10. Institute for Resilient Infrastructure Systems University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA

11. FGV ‐ Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EAESP and FGV EBAPE) São Paulo Brazil

12. Department of Landscape Architecture, Weitzman School of Design University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

13. Zealandia Centre for People and Nature Wellington New Zealand

14. Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand

15. UN‐Habitat, Two United Nations Plaza New York New York USA

Abstract

Abstract Green spaces in urban areas—like remnant habitat, parks, constructed wetlands, and street trees—supply multiple benefits. Many studies show green spaces in and near urban areas play important roles harbouring biodiversity and promoting human well‐being. On the other hand, evidence suggests that greater human population density enables compact, low‐carbon cities that spare habitat conversion at the fringes of expanding urban areas, while also allowing more walkable and livable cities. How then can urban areas have abundant green spaces as well as density? In this paper, we review the empirical evidence for the relationships between urban density, nature, and sustainability. We also present a quantitative analysis of data on urban tree canopy cover and open space for United States large urbanized areas, as well as an analysis of non‐US Functional Urban Areas in OECD countries. We found that there is a negative correlation between population density and these green spaces. For Functional Urban Areas in the OECD, a 10% increase in density is associated with a 2.9% decline in tree cover. We argue that there are competing trade‐offs between the benefits of density for sustainability and the benefits of nature for human well‐being. Planners must decide an appropriate density by choosing where to be on this trade‐off curve, taking into account city‐specific urban planning goals and context. However, while the negative correlation between population density and tree cover is modest at the level of US urbanized areas (R2 = 0.22), it is weak at the US Census block level (R2 = 0.05), showing that there are significant brightspots, neighbourhoods that manage to have more tree canopy than would be expected based upon their level of density. We then describe techniques for how urban planners and designers can create more brightspots, identifying a typology of urban forms and listing green interventions appropriate for each form. We also analyse policies that enable these green interventions illustrating them with the case studies of Curitiba and Singapore. We conclude that while there are tensions between density and urban green spaces, an urban world that is both green and dense is possible, if society chooses to take advantage of the available green interventions and create it. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

Google

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3