The pervasive influence of systems of power on transition readiness for adult care in sickle cell disease: A qualitative study

Author:

Prussien Kemar V.1ORCID,Faust Haley L.2,Crosby Lori E.34ORCID,Smith‐Whitley Kim15,Barakat Lamia P.26,Schwartz Lisa A.26

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hematology Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Division of Oncology Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Division of Behavioral Medicine Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA

4. Department of Pediatrics University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA

5. Pfizer New York New York USA

6. Department of Pediatrics University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAdolescence and young adulthood are vulnerable developmental periods for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), particularly given the impact of social inequities, challenges with transitioning to adult healthcare services, and increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Systems of power, such as institutionalized and interpersonal manifestations of bias, could impact SCD transfer and engagement in adult care through their influence on healthcare transition readiness; yet research in this area is limited.ObjectiveTo characterize how systems of power impact transition readiness factors described in the Social‐ecological Model of AYA Readiness for Transition to Promote Health Equity (SMART‐E) framework at the patient, caregiver, and practitioner levels.MethodsPediatric adolescents and young adults (AYA), transferred AYA, caregivers, and practitioners participated in semi‐structured focus groups and individual interviews examining health equity and systems of power during healthcare transition. Focus groups/interviews were transcribed and coded using a deductive approach via the updated SMART‐E framework.ResultsTen pediatric AYA with SCD, nine transferred AYA with SCD, eight caregivers, and nine practitioners participated in a focus group or interview. Qualitative findings across reporters emphasize the impact of systems of power (e.g., racial bias and disease stigma) on knowledge, skills and self‐efficacy, beliefs and expectations, goals and motivation, and emotions and psychosocial functioning at the patient, caregiver, and practitioner levels.ConclusionSystems of power are prevalent with respect to transition barriers for AYA with SCD and their supports. Structural, institutional, and individual factors with potential to reduce the influence of systems of power should be further identified and targeted for intervention.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3