Affiliation:
1. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy
2. Centro per la ricostruzione articolare del ginocchio IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Milan Rozzano Italy
3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Istanbul University‐Cerrahpasa Istanbul Turkey
Abstract
AbstractPurposeSurgeons generally consider the donor age as a factor that negatively influences the quality of allograft used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, however, the available evidence does not clearly support this statement. The purpose of the study was to investigate if donor age influences the biomechanical properties of allografts used in ACL reconstruction.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted for all relevant articles using MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Collaboration Library, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis. Studies including the analysis of the correlation between biomechanical properties of the allografts and donor age were selected. The role of donor age was labelled as ‘none’ if absent, ‘higher’ or ‘lower’ if the properties were higher or lower in older specimens with respect to younger. The correlation was defined as ‘weak’ or ‘strong’ according to each study definition.ResultsNo conflicting role of donor age was reported for modulus of elasticity, load to failure, strain, stiffness and displacement. The only parameters where the significant results were consistent were the tensile strength and the stress (low or moderate correlations). When considering the tested samples with a donor's age <65 years, a significant role of age was reported in only four out of 13 groups of graft tested (patellar tendon, fascia lata, anterior tibialis tendon and posterior tibialis tendon).ConclusionThe current literature did not allow to state that the donor age negatively influences the biomechanical properties of allografts, making it impossible to identify a clear age cut‐off value to exclude them from ACL reconstruction procedures.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, systematic review.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献