Outside the library: Early career researchers and use of alternative information sources in pandemic times

Author:

Herman Eti1,Nicholas David1ORCID,Clark David1,Boukacem‐Zeghmouri Chérifa2,Rodríguez‐Bravo Blanca3ORCID,Abrizah Abdullah4ORCID,Sims David5,Watkinson Anthony1ORCID,Xu Jie6ORCID,Serbina Galina7,Świgoń Marzena8ORCID,Jamali Hamid R.9ORCID,Tenopir Carol5,Allard Suzie5

Affiliation:

1. CIBER Research Newbury UK

2. Computer Science Department Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France

3. Área de Biblioteconomía y Documentación Universidad de León León Spain

4. Department of Library & Information Science, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

5. College of Communication and Information University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA

6. School of Information Management Wuhan University Wuhan Hubei China

7. TSU Research Library Tomsk State University Tomsk Russia

8. Institute of Journalism and Social Communication University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn Olsztyn Poland

9. School of Information and Communication Studies Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractPresents findings from a study into the attitudes and practices of pandemic‐era early career researchers (ECRs) in regard to obtaining access to the formally published scholarly literature, which focused on alternative providers, notably ResearchGate and Sci‐Hub. The study is a part of the Harbingers project that has been exploring the work lives and scholarly communication practices of ECRs in pre‐pandemic times and during the pandemic, and utilizes data from two rounds of interviews with around 170 ECRs from the sciences and social sciences in eight countries. Findings show that alternative providers, as represented by ResearchGate and Sci‐Hub, have become established and appear to be gaining ground. However, there are considerable country‐ and discipline‐associated differences. ECRs' country‐specific level of usage of the alternative providers is partly traceable to the adequacy of library provisions, although there are other factors at play in shaping ECRs' attitudes and practices, most notably convenience and time saving, as well as the fact that these platforms have become embedded in the scholarly dashboard. There is a dearth of evidence of the impact of the pandemic on ECRs' ways of obtaining scholarly papers.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Communication,Library and Information Sciences

Reference44 articles.

1. Toll-based access vs pirate access: a webometric study of academic publishers

2. Anderson R.(2018).Is copyright piracy morally wrong or merely illegal? The malum Prohibitum/Malum in se conundrum.Scholarly Kitchen Blog[Web log post].https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/04/30/copyright-piracy-morally-wrong-merely-illegal-malum-prohibitum-malum-se-conundrum/

3. Analysis of Sci-Hub downloads of computer science papers

4. Bodó B.(2016).Pirates in the library—An inquiry into the guerilla open access movement. Paper prepared for the 8th Annual Workshop of the International Society for the History and Theory of Intellectual Property CREATe University of Glasgow.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2816925

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3