Mapping local policy approaches to child neglect assessment practice and use of tools in England

Author:

Duman Monica12ORCID,Bekaert Sarah12ORCID,Cocks Alison3,Appleton Jane V.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Oxford Brookes University Oxford UK

2. Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research (OxINMAHR) Oxford UK

3. College of Health, Medical and Life Sciences Brunel University London (Retired) London UK

4. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Oxford Brookes University (Retired) Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractChild neglect has devastating enduring consequences for children and its identification and assessment remains challenging for practitioners. In England, assessment tools and standardised measures have been incorporated in welfare and safeguarding practice to help practitioners' critical observation and analysis and improve their assessments of risk. However, the picture regarding child neglect assessment practice trends on the ground remains unknown. This mapping exercise aimed to, firstly, provide an overview of the approaches to neglect practice and neglect assessment tools promoted by Local Safeguarding Children Partnerships (LSCPs) across England, and secondly, provide a brief examination of the types of tools advocated. An email survey was sent to the safeguarding leads or chairs of LSCPs in England (n = 121). Forty‐two valid responses were received (34.7%). Almost all participating LSCPs had a Neglect Strategy in place and recommended the use of tools and chronologies when working with neglect. Eighteen individual neglect tools were reported with only two of these having undergone psychometric testing. The findings affirm that the use of tools or instruments with low or no testing for psychometric properties continues to be widespread in children's social care and welfare practice in England. Implications and recommendations for practice, policy and future research are discussed.

Funder

Oxford Brookes University

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference67 articles.

1. Child abuse and physical health in adulthood;Afifi T.O.;Health Reports,2016

2. Is early detection of abused children possible?: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of abused children

3. The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems

4. Barlow J. Fisher J.&Jones D.(2012) ‘Systematic review of models of analysing significant harm’ Department for Education Research Report. DFE‐RR199.

5. Child maltreatment: An ecological integration.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3