Outcomes of bailout percutaneous ventricular assist device versus prophylactic strategy in patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Outcomes of bailout percutaneous ventricular assist device versus prophylactic strategy in patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention

Published:2021-05-29 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1522-1946
Container-title:Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
language:en
Short-container-title:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

Author:

O'Neill Brian P¹,Grines Cindy²^ORCID,Moses Jeffrey W.³,Ohman E. Magnus⁴,Lansky Alexandra⁵^ORCID,Popma Jeffery⁶,Kapur Navin K.⁷^ORCID,Schreiber Theodore⁸,Mannino Salvatore⁹,O'Neill William W.¹,Medjamia Amin M.¹⁰^ORCID,Mahmud Ehtisham¹¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Henry Ford Hospital Center for Structural Heart Detroit Michigan USA

2. Department of Cardiology Northside cardiovascular institute Atlanta Georgia USA

3. Department of Cardiology Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA

4. Department of Cardiology Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

5. Department of Cardiology Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

6. Department of Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Cardiovascular Center for Research and Innovation, Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Cardiology Ascension St. John Hospital Warren Michigan USA

9. Department of Cardiology WellStar Kennestone Hospital Marietta Georgia USA

10. Department of Medical Affairs and Clinical Research Abiomed Inc. Danvers Massachusetts USA

11. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ccd.29758

Reference16 articles.

1. Complete Versus Incomplete Revascularization With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft or Percutaneous Intervention in Stable Coronary Artery Disease

2. Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry

3. A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

4. The cVAD registry for percutaneous temporary hemodynamic support: A prospective registry of Impella mechanical circulatory support use in high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock, and decompensated heart failure

5. Impella support and acute kidney injury during high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the global cVAD renal protection study;Flaherty MP;Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2019

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Feasibility of standby ECMO with preset femoral vascular sheaths for high-risk transcatheter aortic valve replacement;Perfusion;2024-06-18

2. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Complex High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Review of Current Evidence;Journal of Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology;2023-10-31

3. Percutaneous ventricular assist device for higher‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention in surgically ineligible patients: Indications and outcomes from the OPTIMUM study;Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions;2023-09-07

4. Mechanical Circulatory Support for Complex High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention;US Cardiology Review;2023-04-04

5. Mechanical circulatory support devices for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: novel insights from the Japanese nationwide J-PCI registry;European Heart Journal Open;2022-06-27